Translate:
Latest SEO Articles: Speaking At:
    Speaking at SMX London 2013
Follow Us:
Follow beanstalkseo on Twitter
Hear Us On:
Webmaster Radio
Blog Partner Of:
WebProNews Blog Partner
Helping Out:
Carbon balanced.
Archives
  • RSS

    XMLRSS

    Beanstalk's SEO News Blog

    At Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization we know that knowledge is power. That's the reason we started this SEO blog. We know that the better informed our visitors are, the better the decisions they will make for their websites and their online businesses. We hope you enjoy your stay and find the SEO news contained within this blog useful.


    January 10, 2013

    Missing Authorship Photos?

    If you’ve become accustomed to seeing your charming mug in the SERPs when you are Google’ing your keywords, it might be rather unsettling to see those images suddenly disappear.

    Rich Snippet SERP example

    Fear not! This isn’t something you have done, or not done, this is actually kicking up a bit of fuss on the SEO forums/discussion areas today and clearly looks to be an issue on Google’s end.

    In fact if you were in need of reassurance, all you have to do is hop into your Webmaster Tools account, and visit the ‘Rich Snippets Tool‘ to get a preview of what your SERPs would normally look like.

    If you are sure that you’re not part of the current issue, or you’re just curious what we’re talking about, the Troubleshooting Rich Snippets page is a great resource to tackle possible problems.

    Google invests another $200,000,000.00 in renewable energy..

    I could have written .2 billion, or 200 million, or even 200 thousand thousands, but why play with such a large sum of money?

    Google certainly isn’t playing around; With this latest investment Google’s grand total in renewable/clean energy is over $1 billion US and growing.

    This isn’t just charity either, some of these investments are just smart business because the returns are very fixed and low risk.

    Illustration of power saved by using GMail vs. Postal Mail

    Being honest about pollution is brave, and bragging about your low footprint is begging for trouble, but Google marches on stating:

    “100 searches on Google has about the same footprint as drying your hands with a standard electric dryer, ironing a shirt, or producing 1.5 tablespoons of orange juice.”

    You can read more about Google’s efforts to reduce, eliminate, and assist others with power consumption/carbon footprints, over on the Google Green Pages.

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:57 am


     

    November 15, 2011

    10 new changes to Google algorithms

    New features from GoogleYesterday, over on the Google Inside Search blog, Matt Cutts shared 10 recent changes to the Google search algorithms from the last few weeks.

    As always these posts can get a bit technical, and anyone subscribed to the feed can just get it from the horses’ mouth. The goal of this post is to put the changes into clearer terms from a SEO perspective:

    Translated search titles:
    When searching with languages where limited web content is available, Google can translate the English-only results and display the translated titles directly below the English titles in the search results. This also translates the result automatically, thereby increasing the available web content for non-English searchers. If you were selling products that appealed to a global market, but hadn’t yet invested in translations/global site structure, this could drive fresh traffic to your sites/products.

    Better Snippets:
    Google’s mantra is always ‘content, content, + more content’, and now the snippet code is focusing on the page content vs. header/menu areas. Because of the way sites use keywords in the headers/menus, coding the snippets to seek out body content will result in more relevant text in search snippets.

    Improved Google generated page titles:
    When a page is lacking a title, Google has code in place to assign a title to the page using various signals. A key signal used is back-link anchor text pointing to the page. If a site has a ton of duplicate anchor text in the back-links, Google has found that putting less emphasis on those links creates a far more relevant title than previously. In this way the titles in the search results should be much less misleading.

    Improved Russian auto-complete:
    Languages are a constant headache for search engines, and new features like auto-complete can take a very long time to mature in languages outside of English. Recently the prediction system for auto-completed queries was improved to avoid overly long comparisons to the partial query to make auto-complete function much better in Russian, and closer to how well it works for English queries.

    More information in application snippets:
    Last week Google announced a new method of improved snippets for applications. The feature’s pretty technical and looks like an entire blog post is coming on just this topic. Here’s an example image that hopefully gives you a gist of how the snippets are giving details, like prices, ratings, and user reviews.

    Example of application snippet from Google search results.

    The feature has been very popular and Google recently added even more options that will elicit a full blog post soon here.

    Less document relevance in Image searches:
    If you look up search engine optimization in Wikipedia and look at the entry for Image search optimization you will note that there’s really nothing to say about SEO tactics towards images. This hasn’t been true, there are signals that Google has to look for when deciding what image to show for a particular keyword.
    Previously, an image referenced in PDF or other searchable documents multiple times would get higher placement in the results. Google has done away with this signal as it wasn’t giving improved results and could easily be abused. *Innocent whistling*

    Higher ranking signals on fresh content:
    Consider if you will, how Google would look if they never gave new sites/fresh content a shot at the top, or a moment in the limelight? By default most ratings systems will show you the ‘best of the most recent’ by default just to avoid older content dominating the results. As a person on the phones taking SEO leads I can tell you there’s always been a ’10 mins of fame’ situation on Google where the explainable happens in the search results with fresh sites/content, only to return to normal later on when the dust settles. Google claims the recent change impacts roughly 35% of total search traffic which could be a significant boost for sites that take the time to publish fresh content, or for new sites looking for a chance to be seen.

    Improved official page detection:
    We’ve blogged recently about the importance of the rel=author attributes, tying your content to a G+ profile, and completing the circle with a back-link from the profile to your site. Google’s added even more methods to establish ‘offical’ pages and is continuing to give ‘official’ pages higher rankings on searches where authority is important. If you missed our article on this topic from last week, here’s the link.

    Better date specific results:
    The date a page is discovered may not always be the date the information is published. Google has the difficult task of sorting out the ‘date’ relevance for search results, and they keep improving on this where possible. A good example would be using duplicate matches to avoid showing you a 3 year old article that was posted two days ago if you specify that you only want results from say ‘last week’.

    Enhanced prediction for non-Latin characters:
    You’d think it’s hard enough to get a predictive query straight when the character set is limited to Latin, and you’d be right. When it takes several keystrokes to complete a single character in non-Latin, a service like Google’s auto-complete would be hard pressed to know when to start guessing. Previous to this update predictions in Russian, Arabic, and Hebrew were giving gibberish results as the user was forming characters.

    These are 10 changes out of 500+ made so far this year. We try to document the most important changes for you but there’s lots of times where Google can’t release info because of exploits/cheating. When that happens you’ll see us chime in with experiments and our personal experience when we can. So while I’d normally suggest folks interested in this topic subscribe to the inside search blog, we know that you’ll only be getting part of the story by doing so. ;)

    SEO news blog post by @ 1:16 pm


     

    October 24, 2011

    Google Searches Minus the Plus Operator

    Anyone who has used Google for any length of time is probably familiar with using the "+" operator in search queries in order to refine their results. This "+" older operator has been around for many years and is widely used by many searchers. It seems that overnight, Google has decided to remove this functionality from search queries.

    Google Plus Operator

    In a recent response to a post in the Google Webmasters Forum, Google employee Kelly F. stated the following in regards to the removal of the "+" operator:

    Hi everyone,
    We’ve made the ways you can tell Google exactly what you want more consistent by expanding the functionality of the quotation marks operator. In addition to using this operator to search for an exact phrase, you can now add quotation marks around a single word to tell Google to match that word precisely. So, if in the past you would have searched for [magazine +latina], you should now search for [magazine "latina"].

    We’re constantly making changes to Google Search – adding new features, tweaking the look and feel, running experiments, -all to get you the information you need as quickly and as easily as possible. This recent change is another step toward simplifying the search experience to get you to the info you want. Cheers, Kelly.

    The new process she outlined will work for most in most cases, but it does seem to make for more cumbersome searches. I personally can understand that Google needs to remove this in the wake of their Google + Social Media platform for obvious reasons, but as a frequent user of this operator that has been in place for the past 15 years I will be difficult to get used to a less intuitive process; regardless if it has the same functionality as the old way of performing the search.

    There was an interesting postscript from Danny Sullivan:

    I can’t believe Google has done this. I use the + command all the time, especially in an age when more and more, Google constantly reshapes a search based on what it guesses a searcher wants, rather than what they entered.

    The functionality is still there, which is a relief. But having to do a search like this:

    mars +landings +failures

    now like this:

    mars "landings" "failures"

    is more complicated. It also goes against 15 years of how search engines have operated, where quotes are used to find exact phrases. Now all those references across the web have become outdated, for no apparent reason other than maybe Google picked a name for its social network that wasn’t searchable.

    I think Danny Sullivan "sums" it up the change very well by saying:

    Imagine people learned how to symbolize addition by using the + symbol, then 150 years later, one of the big calculator makers declared that the + symbol would now be replaced by using the " symbol. That’s what Google has effectively done, no big blog post, no notice, just yanked the command search engines have used for over a decade. And probably because it named its social network Google+ — making it hard to find.

    I think this is an instance where the Google marketers and staff should have realized how the implementation of Google + was going affect search results. It also shows a lack of far-sightedness on their part to not speculate how the coining of the Google + brandname was going to cause problems for searchers. Removing this operator that has been around much longer than Google with no press release shows a profound lack of respect for the subscribers of the Google service.

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:59 am

    Categories: Google
    Tags: , ,

     

    May 10, 2011

    Dr. Nick’s Post-Panda Prescription

    "Hiii Every-body!"

    Since the release of Google’s Panda algorithm update in February, Webmaster’s have been attempting to determine what it will take to get their websites back to their former rankings.

    The Panda update designed to help to reduce the amount of webspam that had been saturating the SERPs for years. The update was designed to remove these low-quality sites from and level the playing field in an attempt to return to a more pristine and organic internet where content and visitor experience are the paramount ranking factors.

    In theory, Panda was designed to address sites that were considered low-quality; that is they did not offer a good user experience, were spammy, or had duplicate or scraped content.

    In a metaphor akin to the cream rising to the top; once the lower quality sites were removed or relocated in the SERPs, the sites that did offer good content and a positive user experience would automatically rise in the SERPs as a directly result of the reorganization.

    The algorithm wasn’t perfect and many legitimate sites with quality content were still hit hard. Many problem sites that have been addressed and updated have yet to regain their former rankings. This created a lot of frustration amongst webmasters as Google was slow to release any specific information as to what constituted a "quality site" or any real concrete solutions for repairing your site.

    On Friday, Google posted an update on its Webmaster Central blog called Providing More Guidance on Building High-Quality Sites.

    Since the beginning of the update the mantra that I have been repeating to clients is: How would you design your website if there were no Google, or search engines or rankings to consider? How would you woo new clients and get them to share your website with others?

    The answer is that you would have to focus on being an authority in your area of expertise, offering quality content that portrays this knowledge and developing not only a pleasing design, but one that is easy to navigate, has clean code, and was not spammy, or full of ads. Another question to ask yourself is: "Do your trust the site?" Would you feel comfortable releasing your credit card information on the site? In other words; does the site inspire trust?

    So listed here in its entirety is the list of tips and suggestions from the Google post. Ask yourself these questions when evaluating your site:

    • Would you trust the information presented in this article?
    • Is this article written by an expert or enthusiast who knows the topic well, or is it shallower in nature?
    • Does the site have duplicate, overlapping, or redundant articles on the same or similar topics with slightly different keyword variations?
    • Would you be comfortable giving your credit card information to this site?
    • Does this article have spelling, stylistic, or factual errors?
    • Are the topics driven by genuine interests of readers of the site, or does the site generate content by attempting to guess what might rank well in search engines?
    • Does the article provide original content or information, original reporting, original research, or original analysis?
    • Does the page provide substantial value when compared to other pages in search results?
    • How much quality control is done on content?
    • Does the article describe both sides of a story?
    • Is the site a recognized authority on its topic?
    • Is the content mass-produced by or outsourced to a large number of creators, or spread across a large network of sites, so that individual pages or sites don’t get as much attention or care?
    • Was the article edited well, or does it appear sloppy or hastily produced?
    • For a health related query, would you trust information from this site?
    • Would you recognize this site as an authoritative source when mentioned by name?
    • Does this article provide a complete or comprehensive description of the topic?
    • Does this article contain insightful analysis or interesting information that is beyond obvious?
    • Is this the sort of page you’d want to bookmark, share with a friend, or recommend?
    • Does this article have an excessive amount of ads that distract from or interfere with the main content?
    • Would you expect to see this article in a printed magazine, encyclopedia or book?
    • Are the articles short, unsubstantial, or otherwise lacking in helpful specifics?
    • Are the pages produced with great care and attention to detail vs. less attention to detail?
    • Would users complain when they see pages from this site?

    There was an interesting comment from Tom Critchlow and Matt Cutts via Twitter where Tom asked:

    @mattcutts "assuming a site completely reworks their site/content after panda, how long before they will regain traffic?"

    @tomcritchlow "short version is that it’s not data that’s updated daily right now. More like when we re-run the algorithms to regen the data."

    This would also explain why so many webmasters have not seen their site regain traffic or rank as quickly as expected. Unscheduled crawling will certainly make the implementation of changes harder on a website. As SEOs we can no longer make changes on a site and then wait for the page to be crawled at a predictable interval and see the results quickly. Perhaps Google feels that by leaving the crawl rate undetermined, or more organic that this will help dissuade spammers from gaming the SERPs.

    There are also rumors of a third major Panda update release that has was released around May 3-6th. Many webmasters have been reporting wild fluctuations in rankings and some oddities in the Google cache and in some instances with site search commands. If you have experienced any problems over the last week with rankings that you feel are attributed to a third Panda release, leave us a comment. We would love to hear about it.

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:14 pm

    Categories: Google,SEO Tips,web design
    Tags: , ,

     

    March 3, 2011

    Bing Pulls Ahead of Yahoo

    It looks as though Bing is finally starting to crawl up the search engine usage ladder. For the first time, Bing has outranked Yahoo in the global search engine market. StatCounter Global Stats finds that globally, Bing has attained a 4.37% share of the global market in February, ahead of Yahoo! at 3.93%. Both engines are far behind Google’s 89.94% of the global search engine market. In the United States, Yahoo! is still maintaining a marginal lead over Bing who has 9.03% of the market. Google still has the lion’s share of the market in the US at 76.63%.

    StatsCounter bases their findings on aggregate data that is collected over a sampling of 15 billion across their network which carries approximately 3 million websites.

    "It is significant that Bing overtook Yahoo! globally for the first time on a monthly basis but it remains a tough battle to claw back Google’s market share. Although Google dipped below the 90% mark in February worldwide for the first time since August 2009 it shows little sign of losing its global dominance any time soon." commented Aodhan Cullen, CEO, StatCounter.

    Source: StatCounter Global Stats – Search Engine Market Share

    In 2009, Microsoft announced that it would be powering the Yahoo search technology. So in essence they are effectively one company. If you add up the two totals as in a single corporate entity to compare against Google, the Bing-Yahoo conglomerate totals about 8.3% of the search engine market.

    As an SEO, Google is the primary search engine that I use for statistics gathering and in our client ranking reports. The fact is that I rarely give more than a cursory glance at Bing or Yahoo on occasion. Having said that, I think that competition is healthy in every industry. One could speculate that the usage patterns have shifted due to the major upsets in the SERPs caused from major Google algorithm updates in January.

    SEO news blog post by @ 7:06 pm


     

    February 24, 2011

    Google’s “SERP-cuts”

    I was performing some searches the other day and noticed a little blue arrow on the SERPs (Search ENgine Results Pages). Since I do not normally use Google Instant, I didn’t notice it right away. After digging around in other blogs, I found that the “little blue arrow” was part of the new Google Instant feature that allows for navigation of the SERPs with keyboard shortcuts.

    How Does it Work?

    The feature will only be active if you have Google Instant enabled. Start by conducting a normal search (such as “seo services” for example). Press the “ENTER” key on your keyboard before clicking on the “SEARCH” button.

    The little blue arrow that appears next to the first result in the SERPS is your “cursor” and shows you your current selection. You can then use a variety of keyboard shortcuts to aid in your navigation of the SERPs.

    While I do not really use Google Instant I do appreciate keyboard shortcuts and find that they really do help in so many ways to increase the efficiency in my day to day job. These are a few of the common one I like to use.

    • CTRL+C (Copy)
    • CTRL+X (Cut)
    • CTRL+V (Paste)
    • CTRL+Z (Undo)
    • CTRL+Y (Redo)
    • CTRL+S (Save)
    • WIN+D (Minimize all windows and go to desktop)
    • WIN+E (Opens Windows explorer)
    • ALT+TAB (cycles through open programs)
    • CTRL+TAB (cycle through open tabs in a browser)
    • CTRL+T (open new tab in browser)

    While I do applaud Google for taking a proactive approach in this area, I would like to see these “SERP-cuts” (Google Isntant SERP shortcuts) without needing to use Google Instant. Your move Google.

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:59 pm

    Categories: Google
    Tags: , ,

     

    February 14, 2011

    Google Chrome Spam-Site Blocker Extension

    Google has released an extension for their popular web browser "Chrome" in an effort to counter act the amount of low-quality or "webspam" sites that turn up in the Google search results. Once installed, the extension allows the end user to report any offending, spammy sites to Google.

    Matt Cutts (principle engineer for Google) describes webspam as: "junk you see in search results when websites try to cheat their way into higher positions in search results or otherwise violate search engine quality guidelines." Read the Matt Cutts blog post regarding the Chrome extension.

    This extension comes shortly after two major algorithm updates this year already as part of an ongoing effort to curb the amount of webspam polluting the Google SERPs. Recently two major sites have been accused of being content farms. Sites that employ blackhat tactics such as webspam are typically marked by frivolous or nonexistent content (JC Penny being one of them).

    Google is following through on its hard-line stance to combat webspam, in an ongoing effort by Google to improve the quality of search results for its users. I applaud Google’s efforts and hope they continue with their zero tolerance policy against sites spamming the search results.

    IMHO, having Google involve the online community to help monitor and report webspam is a great way to ensure that the necessary resources are available to counteract the amounts of webspam that permeate the search results. IMO, this will create a much better user experience for all involved. The fact of the matter is that there are far too many sites for the Google bots to crawl, track and monitor in an effective manner. While I do fully support Google’s ongoing efforts to reduce the amounts of webspam, the reality is that there will always be a way to manipulate the SERPs.

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:50 pm

    Categories: Google
    Tags: , , ,

     

    August 20, 2009

    Website Related Hackers and Malware Getting Smarter

    Any legitimate website owners worst nightmare is to have their website hacked or used as a platform for serving malware (spyware, trojans, keyloggers, packet sniffers, etc). Luckily not only do hacking methods evolve but so does protection and safe guys such as StopBadge and Google’s website warning integration into the result set (actual message displayed under the result is “This site may harm your computer”). But every so often hackers get a little more unique in there tactics.

    Today when visting the XXCOPY website (XXCOPY is a utility similar to XCOPY originally by Microsoft that extends the functionality with over 200 functions!) I ran into one of these issues. If you go directly to XXCOPY’s website www.xxcopy.com there is no issue, however if you Google the phrase XXCOPY and then click on the result you may, or may not get one of the “Reported Attack Site!” message in Firefox (Firefox has the best anti Malware detection scripts).

    After discovering this issue I called one of the reps at XXCOPY who proceeded to tell me that the issue was purely on my computer (talk about a slap in the face to a hardcore techie), and that he couldn’t replicate the issue so it must not exist. Digging further into the issue I soon realized that I was being redirected intermittently over to kb971657 (dot )info (most likely originally setup so people Google this particular Microsoft Knowledge Base article would land on their website), but not every time. In fact it took me 10 tries at one point to replicate the issue (clicking on the XXCopy SERP result, then clicking back and clicking it again).

    By adding this seeming randomness to the malware redirection, as well as detection of referring page (Google in my case) it made it harder for the company to detect as going directly to XXCopy.com worked every time. My assumption would be that this Malware is using some sort of form of detection and cloaking. Unlike blackhat cloaking it is hiding content from the search engine, and only showing it when it meets certain conditions (ie the visitors comes from Google or some other website, and then it does some sort of random number check that meets a secondary condition). Hopefully XXCopy gets this issue sorted out.

    SEO news blog post by @ 3:23 pm

    Categories: Uncategorized
    Tags: , ,

     

    July 30, 2008

    Cuil New Look For Beanstalk Staff

    As a lot of people have heard the ex-Googlers at Cuil have launch their “Efficient Google Killer”, which seems to have become the laughing stock of the SEO Community for terrible results and matching up images with search results that don’t belong to the same website. Today out of curiosity I thought I would “Cuil” my own name and see what kind of results came up, and apparently I resemble a younger Ben Stiller from the 70s with a perm like mullet.


    And if you haven’t guessed Dave is the taller less intimidating one. Here is a close up showing my better side and the Beanstalk URL, if you visit this page there aren’t any actual images in the content.


    On a side note Cuil however does return 1,898 results vs Google’s 923 results for the term “Daryl Quenet”.

    Update:
    One of our Older Readers has told me that this is Hall and Oats, and after Googling for them I found the image is actually the CD Cover from their “The Very Best Of Hall & Oates

    SEO news blog post by @ 1:55 pm

    Categories: Uncategorized
    Tags: , , ,

     

    March 14, 2008

    Buying Vehicles Google’s Way – Google Vehicle Search

    Yesterday while talking to a potential client I noticed a new feature that Google had implemented into the SERPs in the US (If your outside of the US add ≷=us to the search URL, or ≷=ca to see how it doesn’t work out side of the US). The search term the client was interested in was Used Cars Utah, and various other permutations and themed terms. If you Google the term Used Cars Utah, you get an input box and two select boxes for “Location”, “Make”, and “Model”. Having searched for Used Cars Utah “Make” was selected as all with a “Model” of “Utah”, okay so its definitely beta point taken.

    Google vehicle search.

    So next I Googled the root phrase “Used Cars”, up popped 1 input and 2 selects but with different names “Location”, “Make”, “Condition” with Used selected as the condition so now we have two different forms based on the search phrase. Playing around I next Googled Cars Victoria (my home city), and go the results with the Model select box and Victoria selected, with Ford the Make (Okay so I’m assuming Google recognized a Ford Crown Victoria).

    Lastly I was curious where the exceptions are if you Google terms like “Cars Acura”, “Cars Lexus”, “Cars BMW” or other makes you don’t get any results with the manufacturers being #1 respectively for their terms. Now if you change it up a bit and add the term Used Cars Manufacturer, you get the search box for Lexus + Acura, but not BMW. Once again definitely beta, but I’m sure they’ll be making adjustments as time goes by.

    If you own a dealership and your interested in getting your vehicles listed you’ll want to know that it is powered by the Google Base API. Once you start searching through the results you can quickly find vehicles in your region. Currently there are 79,666 used Acura’s on Google Base Vehicle Search. Now thats a bit of a selection!

    SEO news blog post by @ 12:17 pm

    Categories: Uncategorized
    Tags: , ,

     

    Level Triple-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
    Copyright© 2004-2013
    Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization, Inc.
    All rights reserved.