Translate:
Latest SEO Articles: Speaking At:
    Speaking at SMX London 2013
Follow Us:
Follow beanstalkseo on Twitter
Hear Us On:
Webmaster Radio
Blog Partner Of:
WebProNews Blog Partner
Helping Out:
Carbon balanced.
Archives
  • RSS

    XMLRSS

    Beanstalk's SEO News Blog

    At Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization we know that knowledge is power. That's the reason we started this SEO blog. We know that the better informed our visitors are, the better the decisions they will make for their websites and their online businesses. We hope you enjoy your stay and find the SEO news contained within this blog useful.


    January 16, 2012

    Recap of Google’s December Algorithm Tweaking

    Google Algorithim Updates

    As an ongoing effort by Google to increase transparency for changes to their algorithms, Google has been documenting and publishing the updates for public consumption. The following is a recap of algorithm changes made by Google in December of last year.

    While looking at a list of the December algorithm updates from Google, I thought it would be interesting to show the code names associated with them. Codenames are given to updates because they are easier to remember and because they are fun to come up with.

    Updates with codenames:

    Launch Codename/Project Codename Update Notes
    SIMPLE Image Search landing page quality signals. An improvement that analyzes various landing page signals for Image Search.
    CONCEPTS/MEGASITELINKS More relevant sitelinks. Improved algorithm for picking sitelinks.
    GREENCR More accurate country-restricted searches. Uses several signals to better determine where web documents originate; improving accuracy.
    LEAF Better spam detection in Image Search. Extending algorithms used to detect spam in Image Search
    FOBY More accurate byline dates. Improvements to how dates are determined and associatiated for documents.
    LIVE RESULTS Live results for NFL and college football. Live results for NFL.com and ESPN’s NCAA Football results
    LYNDSY Related query improvements. Makes search results more conservative and less likely to introduce results without query words.
    BASCHI/CONTRA Better lyrics results. Improves result quality for lyrics searches.
    PHO VIET Better spell correction in Vietnamese More accurate spelling predictions for Vietnamese queries.
    MATTER Improvements to image size signal. This is an improvement to how we use the size of images as a ranking signal in Image Search.
    SWEATNOVEMBER/SYNONYMS Improved Hebrew synonyms. Refines how Hebrew synonyms are handled across multiple languages.
    HOENGG/SAFESEARCH Safer searching. Better filtering for certain queries when strict SafeSearch is enabled.
    OLD POSSUM/SKIP REDIRECT Faster mobile browsing Uses final smartphone destination url in our mobile search results bypassing redirects to load target page faster.

    Other Updates

    • Soft 404 Detection: Some websites are configured to return a different status code instead of a standard 404 error when a visitor requests a page that is missing. This update improves detection of these soft404s, aka "crypto" 404s.
    • More rich snippets: This update was to improve the process for detecting sites that qualify for shopping, recipe and review rich snippets.
    • Better infrastructure for auto-complete: This was an infrastructure change to improve how the auto-complete algorithm handles spelling corrections for query prefixes.
    • Google Instant enhancements for Japanese: For languages that use non-Latin characters, many users use a special IME (Input Method Editor) to enter queries. This change works with browsers that are IME-aware to better handle Japanese queries in Google Instant.
    • Improved dataset for related queries: Sometimes Google will include results for queries that are related to your original search; this improvement leads to results from more relevant related queries.
    • Tweak to +1 button on results page: This change now shows the +1 button only appear when you hover over a result, or when the result has already been +1’d.
    • Upcoming events at venues: This change to the Places Panel allows for the display of up to three upcoming events.
    • Encrypted search available on new regional domains: Google now offers encrypted search by default on google.com for sign-in users. It is not the default on other regional domains (google.fr for France for instance.) Users in the UK, Germany & France can opt in by going to an SSL version of Google Search for their regional domains (ex. https://www.google.fr).

    We will be posting monthly blog posts detailing the various updates to Google algorithims as soon as they are posted by Google every month. Stay tuned!

    SEO news blog post by @ 10:14 am


     

    November 15, 2011

    10 new changes to Google algorithms

    New features from GoogleYesterday, over on the Google Inside Search blog, Matt Cutts shared 10 recent changes to the Google search algorithms from the last few weeks.

    As always these posts can get a bit technical, and anyone subscribed to the feed can just get it from the horses’ mouth. The goal of this post is to put the changes into clearer terms from a SEO perspective:

    Translated search titles:
    When searching with languages where limited web content is available, Google can translate the English-only results and display the translated titles directly below the English titles in the search results. This also translates the result automatically, thereby increasing the available web content for non-English searchers. If you were selling products that appealed to a global market, but hadn’t yet invested in translations/global site structure, this could drive fresh traffic to your sites/products.

    Better Snippets:
    Google’s mantra is always ‘content, content, + more content’, and now the snippet code is focusing on the page content vs. header/menu areas. Because of the way sites use keywords in the headers/menus, coding the snippets to seek out body content will result in more relevant text in search snippets.

    Improved Google generated page titles:
    When a page is lacking a title, Google has code in place to assign a title to the page using various signals. A key signal used is back-link anchor text pointing to the page. If a site has a ton of duplicate anchor text in the back-links, Google has found that putting less emphasis on those links creates a far more relevant title than previously. In this way the titles in the search results should be much less misleading.

    Improved Russian auto-complete:
    Languages are a constant headache for search engines, and new features like auto-complete can take a very long time to mature in languages outside of English. Recently the prediction system for auto-completed queries was improved to avoid overly long comparisons to the partial query to make auto-complete function much better in Russian, and closer to how well it works for English queries.

    More information in application snippets:
    Last week Google announced a new method of improved snippets for applications. The feature’s pretty technical and looks like an entire blog post is coming on just this topic. Here’s an example image that hopefully gives you a gist of how the snippets are giving details, like prices, ratings, and user reviews.

    Example of application snippet from Google search results.

    The feature has been very popular and Google recently added even more options that will elicit a full blog post soon here.

    Less document relevance in Image searches:
    If you look up search engine optimization in Wikipedia and look at the entry for Image search optimization you will note that there’s really nothing to say about SEO tactics towards images. This hasn’t been true, there are signals that Google has to look for when deciding what image to show for a particular keyword.
    Previously, an image referenced in PDF or other searchable documents multiple times would get higher placement in the results. Google has done away with this signal as it wasn’t giving improved results and could easily be abused. *Innocent whistling*

    Higher ranking signals on fresh content:
    Consider if you will, how Google would look if they never gave new sites/fresh content a shot at the top, or a moment in the limelight? By default most ratings systems will show you the ‘best of the most recent’ by default just to avoid older content dominating the results. As a person on the phones taking SEO leads I can tell you there’s always been a ’10 mins of fame’ situation on Google where the explainable happens in the search results with fresh sites/content, only to return to normal later on when the dust settles. Google claims the recent change impacts roughly 35% of total search traffic which could be a significant boost for sites that take the time to publish fresh content, or for new sites looking for a chance to be seen.

    Improved official page detection:
    We’ve blogged recently about the importance of the rel=author attributes, tying your content to a G+ profile, and completing the circle with a back-link from the profile to your site. Google’s added even more methods to establish ‘offical’ pages and is continuing to give ‘official’ pages higher rankings on searches where authority is important. If you missed our article on this topic from last week, here’s the link.

    Better date specific results:
    The date a page is discovered may not always be the date the information is published. Google has the difficult task of sorting out the ‘date’ relevance for search results, and they keep improving on this where possible. A good example would be using duplicate matches to avoid showing you a 3 year old article that was posted two days ago if you specify that you only want results from say ‘last week’.

    Enhanced prediction for non-Latin characters:
    You’d think it’s hard enough to get a predictive query straight when the character set is limited to Latin, and you’d be right. When it takes several keystrokes to complete a single character in non-Latin, a service like Google’s auto-complete would be hard pressed to know when to start guessing. Previous to this update predictions in Russian, Arabic, and Hebrew were giving gibberish results as the user was forming characters.

    These are 10 changes out of 500+ made so far this year. We try to document the most important changes for you but there’s lots of times where Google can’t release info because of exploits/cheating. When that happens you’ll see us chime in with experiments and our personal experience when we can. So while I’d normally suggest folks interested in this topic subscribe to the inside search blog, we know that you’ll only be getting part of the story by doing so. ;)

    SEO news blog post by @ 1:16 pm


     

    October 12, 2011

    Panda 2.5 Weather Report: To Panic or Not to Panic?

    As most were involved actively with SEO are aware, an update to the Google Panda Algorithm was implemented on September 28th and again on October 5th. This appears to be part of ongoing revisions to the Panda algorithm that continue to cause wild fluctuations in many websites rankings. Confirmed on September 30th, Google’s new Panda 2.5 arrived. It is still unclear if Panda 2.5 had been reversed or updated.

    DaniWeb, who has taken extreme measures to recover from the previous Panda updates, states that the site was hit hard again by this latest iteration of Panda. DaniWeb stated that traffic to the site dropped by as much as 50% on October 5th, which was the release of a previous update to the algorithm.

    Search Metrics has stated that 10 of 30 sites being hit saw an 80-90% recovery in visibility, but also stated that many others saw little to no improvement at all.

    In a post from Search Engine Watch, Simon Heseltine wrote a post asking "Was the Google Panda 2.5 Panic Warranted?" I have to respond with an emphatic, “yes.” Google continues to erode confidence in property by continually pulling the rug out from under its multitude of users. Many sites have still not recovered from the original Panda update at the beginning of the year, despite following all the best SEO and content practices and completing site overhauls.

    As is usual with major updates to the Google Algorithm, there is much speculation over the full scope or impact of the update. This time is no different. With conflicting reports from Search Metrics and sites like DaniWeb it is difficult to know who is correct. The more likely reality is that they are both right. Even though there appears to be an abundance of information discussing tactics for recovering from Panda and despite the valiant efforts of site owners to recover, many continue to be hit hard, while others seem to weather the updates quite well.

    More transparency from Google could help to quell the debates and to restore a measure of confidence in the search-engine giant. Releasing timely information regarding algorithm updates would save an enormous amount of frustration for their users. It is exceedingly difficult to apply a bandage if you cannot see where you are hemorrhaging from. Google is even getting pressure from Danny Sullivan to be more transparent with the Panda updates. This may or may not have prompted Matt Cutts to release a "weather report" regarding Panda:

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:56 am


     

    June 20, 2011

    Panda 2.2 – Don’t Poke the Panda

    pokepanda

    Just when you thought you had heard enough about Panda, whispers of a new update to the algorithm began a few weeks ago when webmasters began reporting more ranking fluctuations and drops in visitor numbers to their websites.

    Due to the previous releases of Panda and the chaos that resulted you can’t blame people for being a little shell-shocked and perhaps jumping to conclusions. While Google did not confirm the release, Matt Cutts stated on June 6th that Google would be releasing version 2.2 of the Panda algorithm update “soon”.

    soon

    Several threads on Webmaster World and Google Webmaster Help forums show webmasters claiming that the recent wild fluctuations they have been experiencing can only be due to another major algorithm update. While many webmasters are claiming that their sites are getting hit hard and taking losses in rank and traffic similar to the first releases of Panda, the main difference now is that some sites are showing gains and experiencing other positive growth.

    This may be a result of the new algorithms ability to rank or to penalize sites for poor content, or it may be that sites that have been taking proactive approaches such as cleaning up low value content and hiding other thin pages from Google have begun benefitting from their efforts.

    As I have said in previous posts regarding the Panda updated, by playing nice with the Panda by producing great content on your site and not poking the bear with poor content, we all benefit. Site owners are forced to create better quality content for their users and SERPs become more accurate and filled less with webspam.

    Check out some of our previous blog posts for some helpful techniques and strategies for surviving the Google Panda Algorithm update:

    Have You Fallen Post-Panda and Can’t Get Up?

    Survive Post-Panda By Writing Awesome Content

    Dr. Nick’s Post-Panda Prescription

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:13 pm

    Categories: Google,Google
    Tags: ,

     

    April 18, 2011

    Don’t Panic!…Panda’s UK SERP Attack

    It has been a week after the Panda was released upon the UK and other English-speaking countries. The Panda Algorithm update was released internationally last Monday and created some much expected “panda-monium” in the rankings for many thousands of sites in the UK and the world. Data from Search Metrics compiled a list of the biggest “losers” and the 20 biggest “winners” of the update.

    At first glance, it looks that the update did what it was intended to do by attacking many product comparison sites, reviews sites and voucher code sites. Many of these “low-quality” sites fared poorly in the wake of the Panda.

    Ciao’s UK site lost 94% of its online visibility while the user recommendations site Qype lost approximately 96% of its search engine visibility following the update. Other sites saw some incredible gains. Tech Crunch realized a 41% increase in its rankings and site like Mirror.co.uk, ITV.com and Metro.co.uk all saw an increase of about 20%.

    Top 20 “Losers” from Google’s Panda UK Update

    Domain New visbility Old visibility Change %
    moneypage.com 25 39231 -39206 -99.94
    pricedash.com 127 55141 -55014 -99.77
    njobs.org.uk 92 30693 -30601 -99.7
    voucherstar.co.uk 126 38748 -38622 -99.67
    osoyou.com 96 26668 -26572 -99.64
    zath.co.uk 161 39768 -39607 -99.6
    shoppingvouchers.co.uk 134 30056 -29922 -99.55
    discountshoppinguk.co.uk 491 66270 -65779 -99.26
    just-food.com 293 39282 -38989 -99.25
    webdevelopersnotes.com 583 54948 -54365 -98.94
    netvouchercodes.co.uk 1935 152376 -150441 -98.73
    pocket-lint.com 2128 165956 -163828 -98.72
    killerstartups.com 869 52717 -51848 -98.35
    wakoopa.com 1334 71525 -70191 -98.13
    aceshowbiz.com 907 46188 -45281 -98.04
    everydaysale.co.uk 3822 175800 -171978 -97.83
    hotfrog.co.uk 1124 44863 -43739 -97.49
    phonesreview.co.uk 864 33418 -32554 -97.41
    electricpig.co.uk 1678 60882 -59204 -97.24
    kgbanswers.co.uk 1009 31427 -30418 -96.79

     

    Top 20 “Winners” from Google’s Panda UK Update

    domain New visibility Old visibility Change %
    ebay.co.uk 1469346 1034302 435044 42.1
    techcrunch.com 174797 124220 50577 40.7
    national-lottery.co.uk 292053 209357 82696 39.5
    econsultancy.com 186175 135804 50371 37.1
    thisismoney.co.uk 234717 180377 54340 30.1
    siteslike.com 175869 140279 35590 25.4
    mirror.co.uk 275876 220937 54939 24.9
    blogspot.com 1006719 819832 186887 22.8
    mashable.com 295137 240714 54423 22.6
    itv.com 345470 282300 63170 22.4
    metro.co.uk 181507 149271 32236 21.6
    independent.co.uk 471896 388280 83616 21.5
    mozilla.org 146282 122471 23811 19.4
    youtube.com 8856696 7446902 1409794 18.9
    vimeo.com 168979 142182 26797 18.9
    wordpress.com 331836 279738 52098 18.6
    laterooms.com 150533 127297 23236 18.3
    dailymotion.com 577590 490328 87262 17.8
    soundcloud.com 150998 128569 22429 17.5

     

     

    Some sites are not happy with the numbers being reported by Search Metrics. They feel that the numbers do not accurately reflect what certain they have experienced. Doug Scott from discountvouchers.co.uk has refuted these numbers saying that:

    If anyone wished for me to send them an image of our analytics then please contact me. Our traffic levels have not changed.

    I am pleased to say that our staff and customers are no longer worried. After Search Metrics published some false data I have had to calm fears. Maybe their data is not what they are stating. Check your facts guys.

    Doug Scott, MD

    Search Metrics explains how they arrived at these numbers and the criteria that was used to arrive at their findings

    Despite some possible discrepancies, preliminary evidence shows that the Panda appears to be doing what was intended by attacking low-quality sites and penalizing those that warrant an adjustment of their rankings the most.

    If what we saw in the US, in any indication of what is to come, there will undoubtedly be many fluctuations continuing over the next few weeks as the SERPs are reorganized in an attempt to level the playing field for all. The biggest thing to take away from this post is to remember: “Don’t Panic!” …SERPs should settle down soon.

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:57 pm


     

    April 14, 2011

    Surviving the Panda-mic

    As most of us know, the Panda update launched by Google in the US in February and this week in the UK has cause a lot of confusion, a lot of ranking drops and a lot of people scratching their heads wondering what to do to recover from it.

    The Panda was designed to attack sites that spit out and aggregate low-quality content based on the most searched keywords on Google. The update caused a lot of shifts in the search results and helped to remove a lot of spam farms from the first page search results. This was great for publishers who were honestly trying to produce quality content. We also saw many splogs removed from Google’s index and many spun content sites lose their rankings, which in turn increased more legitimate sites up in rankings.

    I have put together a few tips for webmasters that may help to offset the effects of the Panda and should help repair the loss in rankings.

    • We know that sites with duplicate content got hammered by the update. Produce only original high-quality, editorial or factual based content.
    • Domain age is important. Do not switch domain names if possible. If you do need to register a new site, then go for keyword specific terms that directly relate to your industry.
    • Google has clearly stated that social media is becoming increasingly important. Sites that were tied to Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn accounts fared better.
    • Sites with embedded video content seem to do better

    Sometime the best approach is to make the most of a situation. To get the most from the Panda try the following:

    • Install a utilize a blog on your site. Write fresh, quality content at least 2-3 times a week. This causes the Google bots to closely monitor your site for new updates.
    • Add in feeds from your social networking accounts. The more links you get coming in from Facebook, Twitter and other social sites, the better.

    For those sites that took a large ranking hit from the Panda, try some of the following recommendations.

    • Don’t ignore you rankings in other popular search engines such as Yahoo and Bing. The ranking drop you experienced in Google should not have affected your ranking elsewhere.
    • Setup a Google Webmaster Tools account and use it to analyze each section of your website. This tool not only helps you analyze and correct problems, but it also gives you a clear indication of the factors that Google is looking at when assessing your site.
    • Study and ensure that your site adheres to Google’s well established quality guidelines.

    Once you have completed these steps, and you are certain that you have performed an exhaustive and thorough repair of your site, you can ask Google to take another look at your site for a reconsideration request.

    Panda is by far, the largest most far-reaching changes to the algorithm in the last decade. Reports indicate that as much as 16% of all search queries have been affected. By keeping abreast of the guidelines established by Google and employing best practices, you will should be able to recoup your loses and regain your former ranking status.

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:44 pm


     

    April 13, 2011

    Panda Spanks eHow

    When the Panda update rolled out in the US a scant number of weeks ago, many expected to see the popular eHow site from Demand Media to be hit hard as the industry regards it as a “content farm.” Oddly enough, eHow actually managed to gain traffic after the update leaving many groups and individuals not only surprised, but angered as the site seemed to represent everything that the Panda update was targeting.

    With the release of the Panda algorithm update in the UK and corresponding tweaks to the US version on Monday of this week, it appears that this time the site did take a major hit in both geographic areas in terms of visibility. According to the SearchMetrics data, eHow.co.uk took a 72,30% hit in visibility and eHow.com took a 53,46% hit. Keep in mind this is UK data, but it has also affected U.S. sites.

    Being that this is only the first few days after the update, we will be watching closely to see how eHow and websites in general react after the Panda has been unleashed upon the UK and other English speaking countries of the world.

    SEO news blog post by @ 8:10 pm


     

    April 12, 2011

    Google says: “Release the Panda”

    Last week we stated that there was some buzz in the Webmaster Help forum from UK webmasters speculating that the Farmer/Panda had been released upon them. It looks as those the people were just experiencing "regular" fluctuations. Google announced yesterday that they have "rolled out this improvement globally to all English-language Google users," such as Google.com, Google UK, Google Australia etc. Thousands of sites were negatively impacted in the US when Google unleashed the Farmer/Panda updates in February of this year.

    The main purpose behind the original Panda/Farmer algorithm updates was to directly combat the copious amounts of web spam that have been permeating the SERPs for years. By reducing the amount of low-quality and content-scraped content, the update was intended to let the cream rise to the top through the removal of low quality or offending sites that did not adhere to Google’s quality guidelines.

    Google said that the new version of the Panda algorithm is designed to incorporate user feedback signals to help searchers find better results. Google also stated that they will begin factoring in the sites that people block as part of a site’s quality score. "In addition, this change also goes in deeper into the "long tail" of low-quality websites to return higher-quality results where the algorithm might not have been able to make an assessment before." Google stated that the additional updates to the Panda algorithm should only affect approximately 2% of US search queries, whereas the original update effected more than 12% of US queries.

    In the press release, Google states that they are getting great feedback from searchers. They are finding better, more relevant results from many great publishers and that are getting more traffic from the original update in February. From the results that we have seen in our corner of the SEO world, we have witnessed many sites dropping significantly with very few regaining their former rankings. It may be a scenario where site owners are hesitant to say that there rankings have improved. Most are still feeling shell-shocked from the effects of the first update and are concerned of what may occur with it’s global implementation.

    Google has been fairly forthcoming about what qualifies as a quality site in their webmaster guidelines. Yet in spite of the valiant efforts by many SEOs and webmasters to reach the new status quo, we still see low quality sites ranking well and high quality sites doing poorly after the update; leaving us all feeling a uneasy.

    SEO news blog post by @ 7:03 pm


     

    April 8, 2011

    Return of the Panda

    There appears to be speculation that there is another Google Update underway. Several reports from webmasters in a Webmaster World thread have stated that they are seeing some significant changes in the Google SERPs.

    Often in isolated reports like this, it is usually the result of specific tests being run on isolated data centers. However, it looks that this is more widespread, leading many to speculate as to whether or not this is an update to the Panda-Farmer algorithm update.

    It may be a case of shell-shocked webmasters jumping the gun and being overly paranoid due to the last update that cause massive ranking fluctuations for many sites across the board. In any case, the reports coming in are preliminary.

    Have you notice any strange shifts in the Google search results over the last 24-48 hours? Beanstalk would like to know. Please drop a comment or send an email to: kyle@beanstalk-inc.com telling us what you have noticed.

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:08 pm


     

    March 15, 2011

    “Do Ads Affect Rankings?”

    There seems to some confusion as to whether Ads do or do not play a significant role in Google Ranking Algorithm. During the initial release of the Farmer Update it was stated that Google is now using the presence of ads on a website as a ranking factor. Of course they were quite vague regarding the specifics.

    As reported from Vanessa Fox from Search Engine Land, Matts Cutts from Google made this comment regarding the Ad-to-Content ratio at the SMX West conference:

    "Matt said that having advertising on your site does not inherently reduce its quality. However, it is possible to overdo it. I had noted in my earlier articles about this change that in particular, no content and only ads above the fold, as well as pages that have so many ads, it’s difficult to find the non-advertising content often provide a poor user experience."

    In a related thread on the Google Webmaster Central forum, John Mu stated that:

    "Another factor that Lysis mentions is ads. For our algorithms, ads generally don’t play a big role. However, they can play a role with your visitors."

    So once again the SEO community is left scratching their collective heads wondering what to do. I think the best practices approach for SEOs is a matter of balance. Let’s break that down a bit…

    • Ads DO affect ranking
    • Placement of ads is important
    • The number of ads is important
    • There is an ambiguous ad-to-content ratio that determines the influence on page rank
    • Too many ads results in a poor user experience

    One does have to speculate how Google is determining ad content from page content to begin with, but at least Google is consistent with stressing the fact that overall user experience is paramount in determining a site’s ranking.

    As far as best practices go, I like to work under the premise of what would I do if there was no Google, no search engines, or rankings. AS SEO’s, what would you or I do to get people to visit, like and stay on our site? The answer is that we would provide a great user experience and develop premium content that engages our audience. We would want to distract our message an d force our visitors to wade through a quagmire of advertisements to find our content.

    SEO news blog post by @ 10:10 pm


     

    Older Posts »
    Level Triple-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
    Copyright© 2004-2013
    Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization, Inc.
    All rights reserved.