Translate:
Latest SEO Articles: Speaking At:
    Speaking at SMX London 2013
Follow Us:
Follow beanstalkseo on Twitter
Hear Us On:
Webmaster Radio
Blog Partner Of:
WebProNews Blog Partner
Helping Out:
Carbon balanced.
Archives
  • RSS

    XMLRSS

    Beanstalk's SEO News Blog

    At Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization we know that knowledge is power. That's the reason we started this SEO blog. We know that the better informed our visitors are, the better the decisions they will make for their websites and their online businesses. We hope you enjoy your stay and find the SEO news contained within this blog useful.


    May 9, 2012

    SEOmoz SPAM Outing

    In the recent wake of the Penguin update from Google and the impact it has had on many sites, Rand Fishkin, CEO of SEOmoz, announced on his Google+ page that SEOmoz is currently developing tools to facilitate the "classifying, indentifying and removing/limiting link juice passed from sites/pages."

    feathers mcgraw

    SEOmoz wants to develop software to add to their existing toolset available to subscribers on their website to aid in determining if their own website or a competitor’s website appears to be spammy in nature.

    If SEOmoz has developed a method to analysis signals that can be used to determine if a site is spammy, it is safe to assume that Google is viewing the page or site in question in the same light. Links that are determined to be spammy will pass little link juice and could potentially incur a penalty from Google. Fishkin summed it the process by saying that if they (SEOmoz) classifies a site or page as having spammy backlinks, “we’re pretty sure Google would call it webspam.”
    Some in the SEO community are angered at Rand Fishkin’s policy of “outing” SEOs for spamming practices, so this time, Rand has enlisted the public to answer whether or not he should do so.

    Some of our team members, though, do have concerns about whether SEOs will be angry that we’re “exposing” spam. My feeling is that it’s better to have the knowledge out there (and that anything we can catch, Google/Bing can surely better catch and discount) then to keep it hidden. I’m also hopeful this can help a lot of marketers who are trying to decide whether to acquire certain links or who have to dig themselves out of a penalty (or reverse what might have caused it).

    antispam

    Preliminary results show that most are in favor of Rand’s reporting of other SEOs for spammy practices. Certainly the reporting of offenders will help Google to combat the unwanted webspam that has permeated search results since the inception of the Internet into mainstream society. It is the new mantra of the modern web; you need to follow the rules and guidelines established by Google for fear of serious reprisal – whether or not you agree with it. Ultimately, what benefits the search results, benefits the searcher.

    On a slighlty related note, I would like to suggest Feathers McGraw as the new face for the Penguin algorithm update from Google…

    SEO news blog post by @ 10:49 am

    Categories: Google,Rankings
    Tags: , , ,

     

    December 21, 2011

    Webcology Year In Review

    For those interested in what some of the top minds of SEO, SEM, Mobile Marketing and Social Media have to say about 2011 and maybe more importantly – what they see coming in 2012 then Thursday’s Webcology is a must listen.  Hosted on WebmasterRadio.fm, Jim Hedger and I will be hosting 2 separate round-tables with 5 guests each over 2 hours covering everything from Panda to personalization; mobile growth to patent applications.  It’s going to be a fast-paced show with something for everyone.

    The show will be airing live from 2PM EST until 4PM EST on Thursday December 22nd.  If you catch it live you’ll have a chance to join the chat room and ask questions of your own but if you miss it you still have an opportunity to download the podcast a couple days later.  I don’t often focus this blog on promoting the radio show I co-host but with the lineup we have including SEOmoz’s Rand Fishkin, Search Engine Watch’s Jonathan Allen and Mike Grehan, search engine patent guru Bill Slawski and many more talented and entertaining Internet Marketing experts it’s definitely worth letting our valued blog visitors know about it. And if you’re worried it might just be a quiet discussion, Terry Van Horne is joining us to insure that doesn’t happen.  Perhaps I’ll ask him a question or two about his feelings about Schema.org (if you listen to the show … you’ll quickly get why this is funny). :)

    So tune in tomorrow at 2PM EST at http://www2.webmasterradio.fm/webcology/, be sure to join the chat room to let us know your thoughts and enjoy.

    SEO news blog post by @ 3:32 pm


     

    July 15, 2010

    Learning SEO: the Beginners Guide to SEO

    Last week I talked about “gleaning” information from a variety of news blogs and websites. Of the sites that I mentioned, SEOmoz is by far at the top of my favorites. They have well written and informative blog posts, a slew of great (and free!) seo tools and a lot of great resources that any new or experienced seo tech would be remiss in neglecting.

    If you are not already, it is only a matter of time before you hear the name of “Rand Fishkin” from SEOmoz. Rand’s name is synonymous with SEO and I would again like to send out props to him and the peeps at SEOmoz for putting together the latest version of their “Beginners Guide to SEO

    Even those of us who consider ourselves to be adept at SEO would do well to give this guide a once over. It’s like watching an epic movie like Star Wars…you always see something that you didn’t catch before. For the seo “padowan” learner, I have found this small (51 page) guide an absolutely indispensable trainer. Fortunately for all of us, Rand is on the light side of the seo “force” and has not been corrupted by the “dark side”. More on the Dark side later ;-)

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:29 pm

    Categories: SEO Tips,SEO Tools
    Tags: ,

     

    April 16, 2009

    Chatting With Rand Fishkin & Barrie North

    We just finished airing a great episode of Webcology on WebmasterRadio.fm. Today we covered a bit of news including the free-to-attend Affiliate Convention – organized in part by my co-host Mr. Jim Hedger.

    Our first guest today was none other than Rand Fishkin over at SEOmoz who discussed a great paper they recent published on link building titled, “The Professional’s Guide To Link Building” (which – I’ll point out – the fact that I’m linking to it in this blog post proves one of their link building points). Highly recommended reading for anyone interested in building links.

    We discussed link profiles, what to look for when analyzing your competitors and how to determine the right strategy for your link building efforts.

    Rand also discussed with us some comments made by Seth Godin regarding how to make money from SEO and whether or not SEO’s need to know code (apparently 21% of SEO’s polled don’t think they do).

    After Rand, Jim and I had the pleasure of chatting with Barrie North from Joomla Shack who discussed with us the benefits of Joomla as well as other SEO-friendly CMS systems. We covered issues such as easy-of-use and what to take into account when first setting up your site.

    If you missed this great episode you can listen to or download the podcast from the Webmaster Radio site here.

    SEO news blog post by @ 2:02 pm


     

    Chatting With Rand Fishkin & Barrie North

    We just finished airing a great episode of Webcology on WebmasterRadio.fm. Today we covered a bit of news including the free-to-attend Affiliate Convention – organized in part by my co-host Mr. Jim Hedger.

    Our first guest today was none other than Rand Fishkin over at SEOmoz who discussed a great paper they recent published on link building titled, “The Professional’s Guide To Link Building” (which – I’ll point out – the fact that I’m linking to it in this blog post proves one of their link building points). Highly recommended reading for anyone interested in building links.

    We discussed link profiles, what to look for when analyzing your competitors and how to determine the right strategy for your link building efforts.

    Rand also discussed with us some comments made by Seth Godin regarding how to make money from SEO and whether or not SEO’s need to know code (apparently 21% of SEO’s polled don’t think they do).

    After Rand, Jim and I had the pleasure of chatting with Barrie North from Joomla Shack who discussed with us the benefits of Joomla as well as other SEO-friendly CMS systems. We covered issues such as easy-of-use and what to take into account when first setting up your site.

    If you missed this great episode you can listen to or download the podcast from the Webmaster Radio site here.

    SEO news blog post by @ 2:02 pm


     

    July 18, 2008

    Rand Explains PageRank

    Rand Fishkin, CEO of SEOmoz takes some time to explain PageRank as it was when it first came about vs how it is today. Admittedly, it’s greatly simplified in this video BUT it’s probably the most easy-to-understand explanation I’ve heard to date and covers the changes in the system well. For those of us watch the PageRank on our homepage and internal pages it we’ve likely witnessed a lot of what he’s taking about.

    To candy-coat it even more, Rand covered the explanation as part of his Whiteboard Friday series so you don’t even have to read. :) Here’s the video:
    http://www.vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=1360917&server=www.vimeo.com&show_title=1&show_byline=1&show_portrait=0&color=&fullscreen=1
    SEOmoz Whiteboard Friday-Has Pagerank Changed? (visit for the comments) from Scott Willoughby on Vimeo.

    SEO news blog post by @ 1:31 pm

    Categories: Uncategorized
    Tags: , , ,

     

    April 24, 2008

    Jason Gambert Trademarking SEO As “A Process Not A Service”

    This morning I had brought to my attention (by Daryl Quenet, Beanstalk’s Director Of Optimization Services) a trademark application for – of all things – the term “SEO”. Jason Gambert has filed for the trademark. After his initial applications were declined he’s managed to wear down the fine folks at the trademark office and it’s passed the initial stages.

    As part of the application Jason has referred to SEO as a process not a service. He claims to want to establish standards and anyone who doesn’t meet those standards cannot use the term SEO to refer to them. And who will dictate these standards? Why none other than Jason Gambert himself. Why do I have a hunch there will be a paid review fee to insure that your processes (not services) meet his “stringent” requirements (of course, this is just a guess).

    Now one thing that REALLY irks me (well – one among many) can be encompassed by the question, “Who is Jason Gambert?” Before this issue arose I’d never heard of him, a number of other SEO community members had never heard of him so I have to ask, who the heck (the word I’ll use in a blog post and save more colorful terms for later) is he to appear out of nowhere and claim to know the standards we should all live up to? While the term SEO is so obviously a generic one that my main objection is that he shouldn’t be able to trademark it in the first place, my next opposition would be that Jason Gambert himself is not in a position of authority in the industry to set standards at all.

    While I’d still object is it was Rand Fishkin, Danny Sullivan or the like – at least I’d be able to sleep knowing that the standards themselves would be legitimate ones. But Jason Gambert? I don’t think I’m going to try to build my business processes around tactics from some guy I don’t know and have never heard of.

    But I digress. This is a HUGE issue. If you’re at all involved in the SEO or Internet communities you NEED to file a complaint.

    Sarah Bird, legal counsel for SEOmoz was the first to file a formal complaint. You can read theirs at http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?qs=91183449. You can also read an awesome summary of the issue, the history, etc. on the SEOmoz site here. It was a huge pleasure to have Sarah on the show to discuss this important issue. Now the work is up to you …

    To file your opposition to this act (and you certainly should) you can do so on the Trademark Office site at http://estta.uspto.gov/filing-type.jsp. If you need more time you can also simply file for an extension that will give you 30 days to complete the process.

    It important that you do one of the two today at it’s the last day to file.

    On a slightly different note. Should this not work and should Jason Gambert actually get the trademark we’re going to have to ready ourselves for battle. it’s going to be important that the SEO community (I CAN still use that term for now) rallies together in defense of any companies charged by Jason. Beanstalk will commit to a $1000 donation to the first company taken to court in the event that Gambert actually get the right to do so to help cover the legal fees. I’d challenge other major SEO companies to do the same. We’ll need to make it so expensive to fight these ridiculous battles against anyone involved that it’s not worth it.

    Now go get filing.

    SEO news blog post by @ 2:35 pm


     

    April 1, 2008

    Google’s Cat Out Of The Bag

    Google gives away the golden key.In what can only be considered a devastating leak of information from Google HQ in Mountain View, a confirmed but as yet publicly anonymous executive from Google has leaked papers detailing some of the key fundamentals to Google’s link value calculation system. The announcement by Google earlier today details some of the contents of this information as they work hard to minimize the effect that this will have on their algorithm as SEO’s around the world scramble get their hands on it. The news, first leaked by SEO-guru Danny Sullivan on Search Engine Land, comes as a shock of sorts and leaves SEO’s scratching their heads figuring out what to do. There has been startled reaction from the community but first – let’s cover a few of the key points (we’ll provide a link to more thorough information below).

    The leaked information confirmed and illuminated the following information:

    • The PageRank we see in the green bar has no bearing on how a site will rank. This information is generated internally based on user expectations and not as a ranking factor.
    • The weighing of factors occurs in the following order: Google’s internal PageRank, position on page, number of links on the page, anchor text, relevancy. I found it VERY interesting that trust is not yet a calculation on link worth though this may be an omission in the information provided.
    • Reciprocal linking is detectable and while it is not penalized, no value is given for the links. A limitation outlined in this is the Google apparently has little ability to to detect legitimate linking sites that happen to link to each other.
    • Paid links are not detectable. There is currently no architecture for the automatic detection of paid links. Google relies on reporting by SEO’s and webmasters.
    • There’s a lot more in there – this is just what I’ve gleaned at the time of this writing. There’s a link below to the documents themselves.

    I had a chance to have a very brief chat with Matt Cutts (quality control guru from Google) who has told us he will be responding on his blog once more information on the leak becomes available (and I’m sure when he’s given the OK by the Gods of Google to talk). His response to this leak was, “… this is obviously an issue we are going to have to deal with quickly. We expect SEO’s to take quick advantage of this information and a strategy is being developed to deal with this and make adjustments to the algorithm shortly.” You can monitor Matt’s comments on his blog and a big thanks to him for taking a moment out of his understandably hectic schedule to answer a couple questions for me.

    On the other side of the coin sit the SEO’s. While we’re all obviously reading all the information we can on the leak – we do so with some concern. In an email from Rand Fishkin from SEOmoz he noted, “You might think this is a great opportunity for SEO’s but it’s not – in fact this is one of the worst things that could happen. All the information we’re all reading will be invalid by the time we could employ the tactics and we’re about to head into a period of significant instability in regards to Google’s rankings . Not only do we have to fear for the rankings we’ve worked hard to attain over the years – we also have to deal with rankings that will be in a constant state of flux over the next few months. Clients are NOT going to be happy.” Good call Rand and you can monitor his comments on the subject on their blog at http://www.seomoz.org/blog.

    This is obviously an issue you’re going to want to research this issue – there’s a lot more about this and links to the documents on the cnet site at http://www.news.com/8301-13577_3-9907571-36.html. Well, the article is actually about Google’s April Fool’s Day joke but we think ours was fun too. :) Enjoy the day. ;)

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:47 am


     

    November 16, 2007

    Whiteboard Friday

    Rand Fishkin over at SEOmoz (OMG, that’s two post in a row about the guy) had his whiteboard Friday today (as he does every Friday). Whiteboard Friday is an “event” during which Rand uses a whiteboard to illustrate complex SEO theories, technologies, etc. in layman’s terms. He does a damn good job at it too.

    This weeks whiteboard was about how the engines can “sniff out” the origin of a story through links and rank the first source of a story even if a stronger source posts about it later and even if other sources have better anchor text. It’s a great post that right now discusses only the news and blog searches but which Rand asks, “could this be expanded to include regular search?”

    Now, in my opinion I don’t believe that this type of analysis and ranking really works in the regular search arena. If I write a 500 word summary of a new Google patent and I’m the first to cover it and, after reading my post, Bill Slawski over at SEO By The Sea writes up on the patent (like he wouldn’t have found it already) and writes a 10,000 word summary of it’s ins-and-outs and an analysis of it’s application in the real world and links to the Beanstalk blog post as the first source he found out about the patent on (thanks for the imaginary link Bill ;) which of our two pages should rank when people look up information on that patent? Heck, I love traffic but even I’d have to say that if Google wants to provide good results they’re going to display Bill’s 10,000 word analysis above my 500 word summary in every search regardless of where it first appeared.

    Of course, Rand is covering the technology in simple terms to illustrate an idea and of course the algorithms are more complex than simply a link mapping system to determine first source with the source ranking regardless of content. Just wanted to make sure that was understood before you watched the video however. :)

    So without further ado, here’s Rand Fishkin explaining how engines recognize first source for blogs and news:

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EW4FcmODg7g]

    SEO news blog post by @ 1:10 pm


     

    November 14, 2007

    Well Done Rand & Co.

    Every now and then one sees a result in the SERPs (Search Engine Results Pages) that you know isn’t going to change. If I enter windows I’m going to get the Microsoft site. If I search again in a year, it’ll be the same. In the realm of SEO these exist as well, or at least I thought they did.

    For those of you who are SEO’s or are learning SEO you’ve likely heard of Matt Cutts (and if not, you will now and it was worth the trip to this blog if for no other reason). Matt Cutts is easily the most public of Google employees who publishes tip s and information on Google (and other ramblings) on his blog at http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/.

    With the massive number of links (literally in the many hundreds of thousands) to his site he basically owns the phrase “seo blog”. I monitor the phrase as it’s one of our secondary terms and have basically known that until Matt quit Google, grew to be 100 years old, died, and about 100 more years passed and noone bothered to renew the domain – only then would someone else rank for the phrase. And yet I was wrong.

    I happened to be searching for SEO information (it happens) and so I looked up blogs to see if there were any new ones I hadn’t been watching. That’s when I noticed it, Matt was now in second place. I was shocked but not by who it was. if youw ere to tell me that Matt would lose his #! ranking and made me guess who I would have been right – but I was still very surprised to see him drop at all.

    So who toppled the king? None other than Rand Fishkin and the SEOmoz team at http://www.seomoz.org/blog.

    Congratulations Rand !!! That’s definitely a job well done.

    On the plus side for Matt and Google, at least we know you’re not cheating. :)

    SEO news blog post by @ 4:48 pm


     

    Older Posts »
    Level Triple-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
    Copyright© 2004-2013
    Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization, Inc.
    All rights reserved.