I’m going to write this post in hopes that the influx of people who seem to be calling us lately asking about PageRank will read it. I’m not convinced that this is the case however it’s worth a try. A trend I’ve noticed as an SEO is that questions tend to come in waves. Today everybody wants to know (or there’s mass confusion on) links and PageRank (or more specifically, why they don’t have a higher PageRank). And so this post is born. If nothing else, it’ll offer me a link to point those people to down the road rather than explaining AGAIN why their website doesn’t have a higher PageRank and why this isn’t really the question they should be asking themselves.
So let’s start from the beginning, why are we all chasing rankings (and since rankings predate PageRank – this is the beginning)? We chase rankings so that we can get traffic. Why do we want traffic? So we can get business. So let’s take a look at what the questions we should be asking ourselves are regarding PageRank, the factors being – business, traffic, rankings and PageRank. Lets see if we can figure out which of the factors are unimportant knowing that the end goal is business. In this equation we will make the logical assumption that if you increase the relevant traffic to your website, you’ll increase your business. Thus, for our purposes here: traffic = business.
- If you have a high PageRank but low rankings will you have an increase in traffic/business?
- If you have a low PageRank but high rankings will you have an increase in traffic/business?
If you answered yes to number one then perhaps you need to visit more SEO blogs and forums to get a better understanding of how Internet Marketing works. If you answered yes to number two but no to number one you get the point – PageRank is irrelevant.
Now, there will be a couple of you out there who will have read some statistics regarding people using a high PageRank as a yardstick to measuring the authority or trustability of a website. Putting things in perspective however we can all agree that this is a small percentage of the population (do you?) and if this trust is what you’re looking for you’ll find it much easier and cheaper (time is money) to attain by adding HackerSafe to your site and getting the roughly 14% conversion increase you can get by going that route.
So we’ll focus on the real business and it’s very clear that what we’re really after is rankings, not PageRank. Once upon a time PageRank had a strong influence on rankings – that is not the case anymore. It is certainly a factor, one among a hundred. Certainly not something worth all the hoop-la.
But thus far I don’t think I’ve really answered the question I’ve set out to – so let’s do that now. Really there are two common questions I seem to get asked frequently about PageRank and they are:
Why isn’t my PageRank higher?
The answer here depends on the site of course however the most common reasons are:
- The links you’re building are horrible – sorry but it’s true. If you come to me with an acne treatment site with a low PageRank and ask why, please make sure you haven’t done mass recip link building with low PageRank car insurance sites (or worse), or
- Google’s lack of PageRank updating is the “problem”. I’ve seen a number or sites that actually have some good link building tactics in place but have a low PageRank. When I ask when the link building started I’ll generally get the reply that it’s been in the last 6 months or so. While there have been some hiccups in the PageRank displayed in the tool bar we haven’t seen a real update since April. These are generally the funniest people to deal with and here’s why. The conversation usually takes the following turn:
“Oh, that’s why my PageRank is still a 2 (or 1 or whatever). I was wondering as I’m sitting at #2 for my phrase.” Which occasionally makes me want to forget I’m speaking with a prospective client and cry out “THEN WHO CARES WHAT YOUR PAGERANK IS !!??!!“
Which is really what this blog post (or is it a blog rant?) is about. The second question I get asked a lot is:
So what are you going to do to increase my PageRank?
The truth of the matter is, nothing. I’m not specifically interested in your PageRank. If you look at our guarantee page you won’t see a “We guarantee to get you a PageRank of x over 6 months.” We run ranking reports, not PageRank reports.
Now, we have to do a lot of link building and our primary focus is to get good relevant links so in the end, the PageRank of the sites we work on will go up however that’s not really the point. PageRank doesn’t pay the bills (unless you’re selling links). Your page’s rank – now that does.
So thank you all for listening to my rant. I do hope that it has answered some questions and please accept my thanks … you’ve been a good counselor.
And Matt (Cutts) if you’re reading this PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE just help us get rid of the bloody green bar. paid links wouldn’t be a problem for you anymore (or certainly less of one) and I wouldn’t have to answer these questions anymore and could just be left to focus on relevancy.
SEO news blog post by Dave Davies, CEO @ 1:18 pm
The latest article by Beanstalk came out today. Titled, “The Dark Art Of SEO” it covers all the advanced black-hat SEO tactics we use including cloaking, blog comment spamming, paid links, FFA spamming for competitor sites and more.
And do I have your attention yet?
Alright, in reality the article covers some of the hidden and often forgotten areas of SEO. Those parts hidden in the dark and rarely accessed. The tactics discussed will take time and patiences and probably money but will give you a huge advantage over your competitors provided that you already have the basics in place.
You’ll find the article here. Nothing like a little light reading over the weekend.
SEO news blog post by Dave Davies, CEO @ 5:54 pm
Today on SEOMoz’s Whiteboard Friday Rand Fishkin discusses links. He gives some valuable advice on how to value links. What might have appealed to me more than anything else is the ego of it. Rand advises us to treat links as an entity outside of Google. His basic advice is:
If the link would be valuable even if the search engines didn’t exist then it’s a good link.
This matches well with what I discussed in my article “How To Win Links & Influence Engines” when I was discussing paid links. In it I wrote:
The only advice I will give to those looking to purchase links is this, ask yourself, “Am I expecting to get traffic from this link?” What this will weed out at the very least is small footer links and links on irrelevant sites. Basically, if the link is worth it without the boost in rankings then continue to pay for it and consider any ranking increases a bonus. If you aren’t getting any traffic from the link then it’s likely not worth paying for. If you’re not getting traffic then the site likely isn’t relevant or the link is in a poor location. The engines will likely pick either of these up and you’ll end up paying for a link that isn’t passing on any weight anyways.
This rule translates well to virtually all types of links.
I won’t go into all the details of the video, it’s only 6 minutes and that’s 6 minutes well spent. You can watch it below:
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRsq5zfXceI]
And a big thanks to Rand for summarizing this topic so very well. That’s why you’re one of SEO’s “Rock Stars”.
And to our visitors, enjoy the weekend !
SEO news blog post by Dave Davies, CEO @ 3:10 pm
Beanstalk’s latest article, titled “SEO For Google In Five “Easy” Steps” was published today. This article outlines the five basic steps to ranking your website on Google today, and in the future. It covers:
- Site structure
- Content optimization
- Link baiting
- Link building
- Social media
You can read the article in full here.
Enjoy the read and good luck (unless you’re competing against any of our clients of course
SEO news blog post by Dave Davies, CEO @ 6:33 pm
There is much confusion out there regarding the rel=”nofollow” attribute despite the fact that it has been around for years. Newbies and hardened SEO-geeks alike are still not 100% sure as to what the value of a link is that contains the rel=”nofollow” attribute. And so we at Beanstalk will be running a number of tests to determine what we can about this tag and any value a link that includes it may pass to a target site.
To insure the purity of the test we’ll be releasing the methods we’re using as we post the results rather than prior to the test completing. The first test, we can say, is to determine whether anchor text relevancy passes through a link that includes rel=”nofollow”.
Stay tuned, we’ll report back as soon as the first test is complete.
SEO news blog post by Dave Davies, CEO @ 1:38 pm
No, this blog post isn’t about how to get a link on Webmaster Radio. The show today is on link building and we’ve got ourselves a lineup of some of the best-of-the-best in the industry to discuss how it’s done.
We’ll be starting off with none other than Eric Ward. Eric is one of the worlds top link builders. We’ll of course have MUCH to discuss there.
After Eric we’ll be chatting with presellpageman on hosted content, paid links and more.
After presellpageman we’ll be chatting with our good friend Neil Patel about the future of link building, social media and more.
It’s going to be an excellent show so be sure to listen in at 5PM PST or download the show tomorrow from here.
SEO news blog post by Dave Davies, CEO @ 12:47 pm
« Newer Posts —
Older Posts »
Copyright© 2004-2012
Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization, Inc.
All rights reserved.