Translate:
Latest SEO Articles: Speaking At:
    Speaking at SMX London 2013
Follow Us:
Follow beanstalkseo on Twitter
Hear Us On:
Webmaster Radio
Blog Partner Of:
WebProNews Blog Partner
Helping Out:
Carbon balanced.
Archives
  • RSS

    XMLRSS

    Beanstalk's SEO News Blog

    At Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization we know that knowledge is power. That's the reason we started this SEO blog. We know that the better informed our visitors are, the better the decisions they will make for their websites and their online businesses. We hope you enjoy your stay and find the SEO news contained within this blog useful.


    July 9, 2008

    Google Keywords & A Test Of Links & Webmaster Radio

    Google Keywords

    Google has just started showing the estimated monthly search numbers in their keyword suggestion tool. For the first time in a long while we’re now able to see the estimated search numbers on the engine who’s results we most want to see the results of.

    As a word of warning, after using it and comparing the numbers with the click through volume for a number of phrases, the number appear to be a bit high – that’s because it defaults to Broad Match but you can select Exact Match from the drop-down and get the the numbers you’re looking for.

    You’ll find this new feature added to the Google tool here.

    A Test Of Links

    Also, there was an interesting test run by Johannes Beusand published on the MarketingFan.com site regarding the value of multiple links to a single page on residing on a single page of a website. He basically strives to answer the question, if there are two or more links on a single page of a site and they point to a single page on another site – how are they treated?

    I’m not going to be mean and note everything from the site here and steal their traffic. :) You’ll find the link to this interesting test here.

    Webmaster Radio

    And today on Webmaster Radio Jim Hedger and I had the pleasure of interviewing Kevin Ryan – the man behind SES. Kevin discussed the show, the organizing of it, and some of the great sessions that’ll be held in San Jose.

    After that (and some ranting by both Jim and myself about the stupid fees we Canadians are charged for cell phones and specifically web usage on them) we had on Dave Szetela from Clix Marketing discussing the recent changes Google has made to the quality scores for it’s AdWords advertisers.

    Again, I could repeat the discussion but it was based on a couple posts covered elsewhere here and here.

    SEO news blog post by @ 3:09 pm


     

    Google Keywords & A Test Of Links & Webmaster Radio

    Google Keywords

    Google has just started showing the estimated monthly search numbers in their keyword suggestion tool. For the first time in a long while we’re now able to see the estimated search numbers on the engine who’s results we most want to see the results of.

    As a word of warning, after using it and comparing the numbers with the click through volume for a number of phrases, the number appear to be a bit high – that’s because it defaults to Broad Match but you can select Exact Match from the drop-down and get the the numbers you’re looking for.

    You’ll find this new feature added to the Google tool here.

    A Test Of Links

    Also, there was an interesting test run by Johannes Beusand published on the MarketingFan.com site regarding the value of multiple links to a single page on residing on a single page of a website. He basically strives to answer the question, if there are two or more links on a single page of a site and they point to a single page on another site – how are they treated?

    I’m not going to be mean and note everything from the site here and steal their traffic. :) You’ll find the link to this interesting test here.

    Webmaster Radio

    And today on Webmaster Radio Jim Hedger and I had the pleasure of interviewing Kevin Ryan – the man behind SES. Kevin discussed the show, the organizing of it, and some of the great sessions that’ll be held in San Jose.

    After that (and some ranting by both Jim and myself about the stupid fees we Canadians are charged for cell phones and specifically web usage on them) we had on Dave Szetela from Clix Marketing discussing the recent changes Google has made to the quality scores for it’s AdWords advertisers.

    Again, I could repeat the discussion but it was based on a couple posts covered elsewhere here and here.

    SEO news blog post by @ 3:09 pm


     

    June 27, 2008

    Two New SEO Articles

    Two new SEO articles came out of Beanstalk today.

    The first article, titled “>1 Is the Lonliest Number” doesn’t so much cover SEO as is intended to help Internet Marketing providers to survive the current economic climate. In a time when competition for dollars is at a high, insuring that you attain and maintain clients is critically importance. This articles outlines how we’re surviving it and notes some common trends in companies that aren’t.

    The second article is more SEO focused. The article, titled “A Beginners Guide To Link Building” is just that. In it we explain why link building is important (from the search engine’s perspective) as well as covering different aspects of links that are factors and a few of the more important link building methods. A good read for those just getting their feet wet in SEO and link building.

    We hope you enjoy.

    SEO news blog post by @ 3:36 pm

    Categories: Uncategorized
    Tags: ,

     

    April 1, 2008

    Google’s Cat Out Of The Bag

    Google gives away the golden key.In what can only be considered a devastating leak of information from Google HQ in Mountain View, a confirmed but as yet publicly anonymous executive from Google has leaked papers detailing some of the key fundamentals to Google’s link value calculation system. The announcement by Google earlier today details some of the contents of this information as they work hard to minimize the effect that this will have on their algorithm as SEO’s around the world scramble get their hands on it. The news, first leaked by SEO-guru Danny Sullivan on Search Engine Land, comes as a shock of sorts and leaves SEO’s scratching their heads figuring out what to do. There has been startled reaction from the community but first – let’s cover a few of the key points (we’ll provide a link to more thorough information below).

    The leaked information confirmed and illuminated the following information:

    • The PageRank we see in the green bar has no bearing on how a site will rank. This information is generated internally based on user expectations and not as a ranking factor.
    • The weighing of factors occurs in the following order: Google’s internal PageRank, position on page, number of links on the page, anchor text, relevancy. I found it VERY interesting that trust is not yet a calculation on link worth though this may be an omission in the information provided.
    • Reciprocal linking is detectable and while it is not penalized, no value is given for the links. A limitation outlined in this is the Google apparently has little ability to to detect legitimate linking sites that happen to link to each other.
    • Paid links are not detectable. There is currently no architecture for the automatic detection of paid links. Google relies on reporting by SEO’s and webmasters.
    • There’s a lot more in there – this is just what I’ve gleaned at the time of this writing. There’s a link below to the documents themselves.

    I had a chance to have a very brief chat with Matt Cutts (quality control guru from Google) who has told us he will be responding on his blog once more information on the leak becomes available (and I’m sure when he’s given the OK by the Gods of Google to talk). His response to this leak was, “… this is obviously an issue we are going to have to deal with quickly. We expect SEO’s to take quick advantage of this information and a strategy is being developed to deal with this and make adjustments to the algorithm shortly.” You can monitor Matt’s comments on his blog and a big thanks to him for taking a moment out of his understandably hectic schedule to answer a couple questions for me.

    On the other side of the coin sit the SEO’s. While we’re all obviously reading all the information we can on the leak – we do so with some concern. In an email from Rand Fishkin from SEOmoz he noted, “You might think this is a great opportunity for SEO’s but it’s not – in fact this is one of the worst things that could happen. All the information we’re all reading will be invalid by the time we could employ the tactics and we’re about to head into a period of significant instability in regards to Google’s rankings . Not only do we have to fear for the rankings we’ve worked hard to attain over the years – we also have to deal with rankings that will be in a constant state of flux over the next few months. Clients are NOT going to be happy.” Good call Rand and you can monitor his comments on the subject on their blog at http://www.seomoz.org/blog.

    This is obviously an issue you’re going to want to research this issue – there’s a lot more about this and links to the documents on the cnet site at http://www.news.com/8301-13577_3-9907571-36.html. Well, the article is actually about Google’s April Fool’s Day joke but we think ours was fun too. :) Enjoy the day. ;)

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:47 am


     

    November 1, 2007

    Links Links and … well … Links

    Today we’re going to discuss three things. Links, links and … well … links. Where to begin where to begin? I know, let’s start with links:

    Bill Slawski - smarter than your average bear.Links
    Today Jim Hedger and I hosted our weekly radio show on Webmaster Radio. We covered a variety of topics from Google surpassing $700/share in trading to the battle over advertising and Google’s upcoming issues with Facebook (i.e. Facebook stands to provide a TON of relevant search and advertising opportunities and they’re going to provide them to Microsoft).

    After a brief discussion on those topics we had on patent guru Bill Slawski for the remained of the show to discuss … you guessed it … links. Bill definitely knows more than your average bear about search engines and links and was happy to share his wisdom bringing up important points to consider such as the move AWAY from global search results to results tailored more to the individual user’s likes and dislikes as defined the the user, their search behavior and the behavior of similar users. If you’re interested in this subject (and if rankings are important to you – you should be) you can read more about it in an article I wrote on Personalization as well as on Bill’s blog where he lists the important patents related to personalization. To get a full feel for it you’ve just going to have to visit Webmaster Radio and download the podcast. :)

    Links
    And so let’s move on to topic #2. Links. The link counts are getting messed up at Google again (not that they’ve ever been particularly reliable. As Jim Hedger points out, whenever we see these sorts of fluctuations going on it usually means there’s something bigger about to happen.

    I was already predicting an algorithm update later this week or over the weekend. Could this just be the tremors before the Earthquake. And please dear God let Google haven’t learned a valuable lesson from the Florida update of 2003. ;) (and for those of you who were SEO’s at the time (white hat at least) you’ll shudder at the mere though)

    Links
    And lastly we’re look at links. Well, we won’t so much look at links as we will a rap about them. I’ve gotta say, this is a first for me. :)

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qC3UNewnA5g]

    SEO news blog post by @ 2:55 pm


     

    October 23, 2007

    PageRank Isn’t The Question; Page Rank Is.

    I’m going to write this post in hopes that the influx of people who seem to be calling us lately asking about PageRank will read it. I’m not convinced that this is the case however it’s worth a try. A trend I’ve noticed as an SEO is that questions tend to come in waves. Today everybody wants to know (or there’s mass confusion on) links and PageRank (or more specifically, why they don’t have a higher PageRank). And so this post is born. If nothing else, it’ll offer me a link to point those people to down the road rather than explaining AGAIN why their website doesn’t have a higher PageRank and why this isn’t really the question they should be asking themselves.

    So let’s start from the beginning, why are we all chasing rankings (and since rankings predate PageRank – this is the beginning)? We chase rankings so that we can get traffic. Why do we want traffic? So we can get business. So let’s take a look at what the questions we should be asking ourselves are regarding PageRank, the factors being – business, traffic, rankings and PageRank. Lets see if we can figure out which of the factors are unimportant knowing that the end goal is business. In this equation we will make the logical assumption that if you increase the relevant traffic to your website, you’ll increase your business. Thus, for our purposes here: traffic = business.

    1. If you have a high PageRank but low rankings will you have an increase in traffic/business?
    2. If you have a low PageRank but high rankings will you have an increase in traffic/business?

    If you answered yes to number one then perhaps you need to visit more SEO blogs and forums to get a better understanding of how Internet Marketing works. If you answered yes to number two but no to number one you get the point – PageRank is irrelevant.

    Now, there will be a couple of you out there who will have read some statistics regarding people using a high PageRank as a yardstick to measuring the authority or trustability of a website. Putting things in perspective however we can all agree that this is a small percentage of the population (do you?) and if this trust is what you’re looking for you’ll find it much easier and cheaper (time is money) to attain by adding HackerSafe to your site and getting the roughly 14% conversion increase you can get by going that route.

    So we’ll focus on the real business and it’s very clear that what we’re really after is rankings, not PageRank. Once upon a time PageRank had a strong influence on rankings – that is not the case anymore. It is certainly a factor, one among a hundred. Certainly not something worth all the hoop-la.

    But thus far I don’t think I’ve really answered the question I’ve set out to – so let’s do that now. Really there are two common questions I seem to get asked frequently about PageRank and they are:

    Why isn’t my PageRank higher?
    The answer here depends on the site of course however the most common reasons are:

    • The links you’re building are horrible – sorry but it’s true. If you come to me with an acne treatment site with a low PageRank and ask why, please make sure you haven’t done mass recip link building with low PageRank car insurance sites (or worse), or
    • Google’s lack of PageRank updating is the “problem”. I’ve seen a number or sites that actually have some good link building tactics in place but have a low PageRank. When I ask when the link building started I’ll generally get the reply that it’s been in the last 6 months or so. While there have been some hiccups in the PageRank displayed in the tool bar we haven’t seen a real update since April. These are generally the funniest people to deal with and here’s why. The conversation usually takes the following turn:
      “Oh, that’s why my PageRank is still a 2 (or 1 or whatever). I was wondering as I’m sitting at #2 for my phrase.” Which occasionally makes me want to forget I’m speaking with a prospective client and cry out “THEN WHO CARES WHAT YOUR PAGERANK IS !!??!!

    Which is really what this blog post (or is it a blog rant?) is about. The second question I get asked a lot is:

    So what are you going to do to increase my PageRank?
    The truth of the matter is, nothing. I’m not specifically interested in your PageRank. If you look at our guarantee page you won’t see a “We guarantee to get you a PageRank of x over 6 months.” We run ranking reports, not PageRank reports.

    Now, we have to do a lot of link building and our primary focus is to get good relevant links so in the end, the PageRank of the sites we work on will go up however that’s not really the point. PageRank doesn’t pay the bills (unless you’re selling links). Your page’s rank – now that does. :)

    So thank you all for listening to my rant. I do hope that it has answered some questions and please accept my thanks … you’ve been a good counselor. ;)

    And Matt (Cutts) if you’re reading this PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE just help us get rid of the bloody green bar. paid links wouldn’t be a problem for you anymore (or certainly less of one) and I wouldn’t have to answer these questions anymore and could just be left to focus on relevancy. :)

    SEO news blog post by @ 1:18 pm

    Categories: Uncategorized
    Tags: , ,

     

    October 19, 2007

    The Dark Arts Of SEO

    The latest article by Beanstalk came out today. Titled, “The Dark Art Of SEO” it covers all the advanced black-hat SEO tactics we use including cloaking, blog comment spamming, paid links, FFA spamming for competitor sites and more.

    And do I have your attention yet? ;)

    Alright, in reality the article covers some of the hidden and often forgotten areas of SEO. Those parts hidden in the dark and rarely accessed. The tactics discussed will take time and patiences and probably money but will give you a huge advantage over your competitors provided that you already have the basics in place.

    You’ll find the article here. Nothing like a little light reading over the weekend. ;)

    SEO news blog post by @ 5:54 pm


     

    September 21, 2007

    Whiteboard Friday – Rand On Links

    Today on SEOMoz’s Whiteboard Friday Rand Fishkin discusses links. He gives some valuable advice on how to value links. What might have appealed to me more than anything else is the ego of it. Rand advises us to treat links as an entity outside of Google. His basic advice is:

    If the link would be valuable even if the search engines didn’t exist then it’s a good link.

    This matches well with what I discussed in my article “How To Win Links & Influence Engines” when I was discussing paid links. In it I wrote:

    The only advice I will give to those looking to purchase links is this, ask yourself, “Am I expecting to get traffic from this link?” What this will weed out at the very least is small footer links and links on irrelevant sites. Basically, if the link is worth it without the boost in rankings then continue to pay for it and consider any ranking increases a bonus. If you aren’t getting any traffic from the link then it’s likely not worth paying for. If you’re not getting traffic then the site likely isn’t relevant or the link is in a poor location. The engines will likely pick either of these up and you’ll end up paying for a link that isn’t passing on any weight anyways.

    This rule translates well to virtually all types of links.

    I won’t go into all the details of the video, it’s only 6 minutes and that’s 6 minutes well spent. You can watch it below:

    [youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRsq5zfXceI]

    And a big thanks to Rand for summarizing this topic so very well. That’s why you’re one of SEO’s “Rock Stars”. :)

    And to our visitors, enjoy the weekend !

    SEO news blog post by @ 3:10 pm


     

    July 17, 2007

    Google Optimization Article Published

    Beanstalk’s latest article, titled “SEO For Google In Five “Easy” Steps” was published today. This article outlines the five basic steps to ranking your website on Google today, and in the future. It covers:

    • Site structure
    • Content optimization
    • Link baiting
    • Link building
    • Social media

    You can read the article in full here.

    Enjoy the read and good luck (unless you’re competing against any of our clients of course ;)

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:33 pm


     

    June 6, 2007

    A Test Of rel=”nofollow”

    There is much confusion out there regarding the rel=”nofollow” attribute despite the fact that it has been around for years. Newbies and hardened SEO-geeks alike are still not 100% sure as to what the value of a link is that contains the rel=”nofollow” attribute. And so we at Beanstalk will be running a number of tests to determine what we can about this tag and any value a link that includes it may pass to a target site.

    To insure the purity of the test we’ll be releasing the methods we’re using as we post the results rather than prior to the test completing. The first test, we can say, is to determine whether anchor text relevancy passes through a link that includes rel=”nofollow”.

    Stay tuned, we’ll report back as soon as the first test is complete.

    SEO news blog post by @ 1:38 pm

    Categories: Uncategorized
    Tags: ,

     

    « Newer PostsOlder Posts »
    Level Triple-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
    Copyright© 2004-2013
    Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization, Inc.
    All rights reserved.