Translate:
Latest SEO Articles: Speaking At:
    Speaking at SMX London 2013
Follow Us:
Follow beanstalkseo on Twitter
Hear Us On:
Webmaster Radio
Blog Partner Of:
WebProNews Blog Partner
Helping Out:
Carbon balanced.
Archives
  • RSS

    XMLRSS

    Beanstalk's SEO News Blog

    At Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization we know that knowledge is power. That's the reason we started this SEO blog. We know that the better informed our visitors are, the better the decisions they will make for their websites and their online businesses. We hope you enjoy your stay and find the SEO news contained within this blog useful.


    February 14, 2013

    iOS popularity = Big Bills for Bing Hating

    We decided to call a spade a spade, and Google is paying a fee to keep Bing from being the default search engine on iOS.

    The fee is based on per-unit pricing, and not only are there more units than ever, but the per-unit price is also going from $3.20 last year to an estimated $3.50 per unity in 2013!

    A flock of sheep attempting to enter a building with an apple logo at the same time.
    Given the growing user base these should almost be rabbits?

     
    Since the prices are a guesstimate, one can honestly say that it will cost more for the exclusive right to the default search engine on iOS in 2013.

    However there are certain ‘publications’ that have forgone the guessing part and are rather certain that Google will pay up.

    For example..

    Techcrunch title: GOOGLE TO PAY APPLE 1 BILLION
    An honest title: GOOGLE COULD PAY APPLE 1 BILLION

    In fact, if Samsung, or Google (via it’s Motorolla Mobillity acquisition), can keep one-upping each of the new iPhones, then the cost of licensing to the user-base will be peaking at a point which it will never return to again.

    But is it worth the money knowing how much of a search advantage Google has over Bing? Well that depends entirely on who you ask!

    Apple pundit:

    People will use whatever is the default like pack of blind sheep. Everyone knows this.

    Google fan:

    If that’s true then why is the Google Maps app on iOS the most popular app on the device? People clearly don’t just use the default apple maps?

    .. and really, if we’re talking about users who skipped over the BlackBerries, Nokias, Samsungs, etc.., for a specific device, then perhaps we should give them some credit for also choosing a better search experience?

    After all, how many times would you let your phone load Bing before trying to switch it?

    I personally would let a ‘Bing’ search happen once at the most, just to get info on “setting default search engine on iOS”. :)

    SEO news blog post by @ 5:08 pm


     

    December 10, 2012

    Windows 8 – Worst Christmas Present Evar

    Wondering what to get your friend’s or loved ones for Christmas? You and me both….but what would you give to your enemies? According to Phillip Greenspun’s Weblog, Windows 8.

    Windows 8 screenshot

    Windows 8 Apps

    Eminent MIT professor Phillip Greenspun has written a particularly scathing review of the new OS and points out some of it major failings. Greenspun opened his rant with the statement that Microsoft had four years to study Android and more than five to study iOS in order to develop a useful product, but was still unable to deliver a useful tablet experience.

    "Suppose that you are an expert user of Windows NT/XP/Vista/7, an expert user of an iPad and an expert user of an Android phone… you will have no idea how to use Windows 8," Greenspun wrote.

    • Lack of a permanent on-screen back button and Home button. Neither is present on the Windows 8 Tablet screen. The closest thing to a HOME button on Windows 8 is the “Windows” key on a keyboard (which is redundant as a keyboard is not always available or required)
    • No context sensitive menu system. The new OS lacks this interface standard.
    • Microsoft has attempted to offer support for a standard mouse & windows desktop in a very inconvenient manner. It does not allow for multi tasking traditional application alongside of the tablet interface. It is either the old Windows XP desktop or the new Android-like tablet environment.
    • You cannot bypass this by sticking to one interface or the other; some functions such as “start an application” or the “Restart the computer” functions are only available from the tablet interface.
    • In the tablet application, an additional click will open a web browser, causing the tablet screen to disappear and take you to the desktop.
    • Many apps that appear on the “All Apps” menu at the bottom of the screen (which is only accessible if you swipe from the top of your screen) will dump you right back to you the desktop on first click.
    • You cannot use a web browser and the tablet interface at the same time. You need to go to your desktop to use the browser but then cannot see the tablet interface.

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:25 am

    Categories: Technology
    Tags: , ,

     

    May 10, 2012

    No Browser Bans on Windows 8 ARM Edition

    We could have ‘spun’ the information that it’s very unlikely we’ll see competing browsers in ARM edition of Windows 8, explaining that the difficulties make it the same as a ‘ban’…

    …But we respect the fact that all (3?) of our readers come here for the truth on these topics, and only dirty laundry needs a spin cycle.

    Where else is FireFox ‘banned’?

    ChromeOS ? Yep!

    iOS ? Yessir!

    So why would Firefox/Mozilla come out today and only complain there’s a ‘ban’ on Firefox for Windows 8 ARM Edition?

    Well from what I can tell, they never did, and the ‘b-word’ was all ‘spin’ by a very annoying technology news site that keeps amazing us with bad headlines and horribly inaccurate publications.

    The TRUTH is that it will be VERY hard for any company to get approval for a browser running in Windows 8 ARM Edition because it’s not just ‘another version’ of Windows, it’s a Mobile OS with very clear goals that make it unique.

    First of all is memory handling and battery use. By now we should all understand that you can’t deploy programs coded for x86 operating systems and expect them to sip carefully on resources like batteries and memory without some major changes.

    Since ARM is aimed at ‘portable’ we can also expect people to seek more privacy and security on these devices. Allowing any-old-app onto the OS won’t happen. You’ve had to have a certificate to publish your apps on Microsoft’s mobile operating systems since the very first days of Windows Mobile, and that will not change any time soon.

    If Microsoft wants to protect the quality and end user experience of their mobile products, locking down risky third party software clearly is one of the best ways for them to do it.

    This is in no way a ‘ban’ on applications, and Microsoft admits that they are willing to help developers reach a quality standard that will permit them to publish to this new mobile platform.

    On the plus side, I was tossing out some rather negative feelings about Microsoft’s investments in technical news sites, and this latest fumble leaves me with some doubts as to who’s invested in whom. Either that or this oft mentioned news source is chock full of people who not only don’t know what’s going on but they don’t even know the hand that feeds them? Crazy.

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:10 am


     

    June 7, 2011

    Jobs gives the skinny on iCloud

    A slender Steve jobs came out of medical leave to deliver the keynote address at the 2011 Developers Conference hosted by Apple.

    South Park version of Steve Jobs

    Looking more like the South Park rendition of the man behind Apple, Steve was notably tired and unhealthy looking (much like the Canucks last night) as he delivered all the details on the new iCloud service:

    - Works with iPhones, iPads, iPods, iMacs, and iBooks
    - Synchronizes contacts, calendars, and files among devices
    - Basic service is free (replacing the $99/yr MobileMe)

    While the offerings are similar to free services from Google, Amazon, Dropbox, etc.., they are some firsts for Apple and will assist Apple users who have legacy audio on CDs.

    For a fee of $25 (US) each year, Apple will scan the hard disk of a customer to seek out all non-iTunes music on the assumption they were converted from a CD the user owns. Music that is not already on iTunes will be uploaded to iCloud. If the music is already on iCloud then the song will be added to the user’s iCloud locker without the need to re-purchase music.

    Apple mentioned that they are in talks with major recording companies to make this possible, which is a far cry from having those companies on board with such a consumer-friendly design.

    Also announced was the Lion OS update for Macintosh. Consumers next month will be able to purchase Lion for $32 and can expect enhanced touch control features, like task switching with gestures, to be included.

    iOS5 was also mentioned, as it will come with a new showcase for content that used to be the domain of printed materials, such as newspapers and magazines. Consumers are supposed to think of this as a digital newsstand, however there was no mention of how this presentation would make the content more accessible or interesting. Tweeting from photo apps and more social media connectivity with Facebook seems to be one of the biggest highlights, but we can expect more details closer to the release date.

    PS: Don’t forget, tomorrow is IPv6 day, don’t miss your chance to be part of the test.

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:16 pm


     

    May 3, 2011

    I For One, Welcome Our Google-Android Overlords!

    Google continues to be dismissive over the public’s concerns regarding the ability of its mobile devices to send precise user locations back to its servers. Google has been collecting the location information from millions of mobile phone and devices stating that the information was "extremely important" to the direction of the company’s future.

    Andy Rubin, Senior Vice President of Mobile at Google wrote to Larry Page, founder and now CEO, explaining that location data from mobile phones was "extremely valuable to Google," especially given the privacy blow-up concerning its Street View cars at the time.

    Google is suspected in gathering the personal data of portal users from October to May through various Wi-Fi networks during the implementation of its controversial street view program last year. Resulting investigations in the US, Germany Korea and Australia has forced Google to acquire this data through alternate means.

    Google location manager Steve Lee told founder Page in the memo: "I cannot stress enough how important Google’s wifi location database is to our Android and mobile product strategy," "We absolutely do care about this because we need wifi data collection in order to maintain and improve our wifi location service."

    Google plans to use the data to create a database of Wi-Fi hotspots, for improving their Google maps services and to establish their increasing geo-specific advertising market.

    A researcher from Los Angeles, Sammy Kamkar showed how Google Android smart phones where transmitting GPS locations and other data back to Google up to “several times an hour.”

    The biggest concern that arises from this data collection comes if the data is compromised and falls into the wrong hands. The data is precise enough to allow a person to correlate the timing and the frequency of phone usage to pinpoint the home address of an Android phone user.

    "If your phone is at the same location during night hours, they know where you live," says Kamkar. "If your phone location is on the move, they can guess that you’re in a car and even calculate how fast your car is moving."

    How it Works:

    The Google Android system collects information about surrounding Wi-Fi networks and nearby cell towers. It is then uploaded and stored in a cache file. Unlike Apple’s iOS, there is a limit on the size of the file, so only the last 200 Wi-Fi networks and 50 cell tower locations are recorded. The data is transmitted along with a unique identifier for the phone itself, and is unencrypted.

    In a related story, two Android users are filing a class-action lawsuit against Google in the amount of $50 million USD. The plaintiffs, Julie Brown and Kayla Molaski of Oakland County say in the suit that Google’s privacy policy did not state that the phones would broadcast their location information. They further state that the privacy policy was written in such a way that most users would not be able to clearly understand that the privacy policy allowed for Google to track user’s locations.

    Last week Google issued the following statement: "all location sharing on Android is opt-in by the user." and that "we provide users with notice and control over the collection, sharing and use of location in order to provide a better mobile experience on Android devices. Any location data that is sent back to Google location servers is anonymized and is not tied or traceable to a specific user."

    Recently, Apple has become the target of a class action suit and both companies are now under increasing scrutiny. Both Google and Apple are expected to testify on May 10 to Congress about its data collecting practices.

    SEO news blog post by @ 8:49 pm


     

    Level Triple-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
    Copyright© 2004-2013
    Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization, Inc.
    All rights reserved.