Translate:
Latest SEO Articles: Speaking At:
    Speaking at SMX London 2013
Follow Us:
Follow beanstalkseo on Twitter
Hear Us On:
Webmaster Radio
Blog Partner Of:
WebProNews Blog Partner
Helping Out:
Carbon balanced.
Archives
  • RSS

    XMLRSS

    Beanstalk's SEO News Blog

    At Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization we know that knowledge is power. That's the reason we started this SEO blog. We know that the better informed our visitors are, the better the decisions they will make for their websites and their online businesses. We hope you enjoy your stay and find the SEO news contained within this blog useful.


    April 18, 2012

    CBC’s Free Music Gets Cold Shoulder

    cbc radio logo

    The online music debate is heating up north of the American border. Several companies have formed a coalition in an effort to shut down a free music website recently launched by the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation (CBC) stating that their actions threaten to ruin the music business for the rest of the industry.

    The coalition is comprised of Quebecor Inc., Stingray Digital, Cogeco Cable Inc., the Jim Patterson Group and Golden West Radio is convinced that the new free music service offered from CBCmusic.ca will have a catastrophic impact on private radio stations, streaming music websites and of course themselves. The coalition hopes to include Rogers Communication Inc. and Corus Entertainment Inc. which are two of the largest owners of radio stations in Canada.

    The Coalition intends to file a formal complaint with the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunication Commission (CRTC) stating that the broadcaster has no legal right under its current mandate to compete with private broadcasters in the online music arena.

    "The only music that you can hear for free is when the birds sing," said Stingray CEO Eric Boyko, whose company runs the Galaxie music app that charges users $4.99 a month for unlimited listening. "There is a cost to everything, yet CBC does not seem to think that is true."

    The main source of contention is the fact that the CBC avoids paying royalty fees because they are considered a not-for-profit corporation. The coalition contends that the CBC must charge subscribers of for their streaming service.

    In a letter, the coalition demands that Ottawa’s Federal Heritage Minister James Moore to either shut the site down, force it to play only Canadian music, or charge for access like private companies do. There has been no follow up statement from Mr. Moore.

    Where Canada is. gif

    "The CBC is using the preferential royalty rates it receives from the various collective societies because of its status as a non-profit public broadcaster to make the service viable in the long term," the group wrote in a letter to be delivered to the minister today.

    "We asked that the CBC be compelled to justify its actions and explain how the launch of the CBC Music service is not competitive with existing services offered by private broadcasters and how it is not damaging to the industry."

    The CBC’s actions are part of a larger dispute regarding the role of the CBC, whose federal funding was slashed in Jim Flaherty’s most recent budget and about how online music services should compensate rights holders for music played online.

    Broadcasters feel that because of the recent budget cuts, the CBC will record fewer live music broadcasts and will need to introduce advertising on its Radio 2 network. There are growing concerns that the musicrtc, cbc, c service is a foreshadowing of the CBC’s larger ambitions to cut into their profits.

    "These actions further distances the corporation from its mandate, while placing it directly on a collision course with private broadcasters who can only rely on advertising and subscription revenues to sustain their services," the broadcasters warned.

    After the service was launched by the CBC in February, the Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers stated that when it set flat fees for the more than 100,000 music publishers it represents, it never envisioned a constant stream of music flooding the Internet.

    The society plans to review the royalty policies in the wake of the new CBC service which is becoming exceedingly popular with over 4.2 million hours of music streamed from listeners to date.

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:28 am

    Categories: Net Neutrality
    Tags: , ,

     

    February 7, 2011

    SHAW Cable & CRTC Metered Internet Usage

    UPDATE:

    It seems that SHAW is already feeling the blowback from a potential CRTC ruling that would allow for more UBB (User Bandwidth Billing) and could be seeing customers leaving.

    This just in from the SHAW Facebook page:

    Hello everyone,

    Today we have made an announcement regarding Usage Based Billing, and want to make sure that everyone knows.

    You can read more about this here http://www.shaw.ca/Internet/New-Data-Usage/

    And the press release here http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/Shaw-to-Engage-Customers-in-Consultation-Process-on-Internet-Usage-Allowances-TSX-SJR.B-1392517.htm

    It is important to let everyone know that while we welcome comments and feedback to take place on this board, we will be focused on the responses we get via email at shawfeedback@sjrb.ca and in the discussions that take place in February and March.

    We hope you are all as excited about this as we are, and look forward to what you have to hear!

    -Shaw eCare

    END OF UPDATE
    ———————//——————–

    As part of researching the upcoming CRTC ruling stating that ISPs could charge extra fees for bandwidth usage, I submitted an email inquiry to Shaw Cable Systems regarding their stance on the issue, or for any feedback to the looming decision by the CRTC. I really did not expect a response (especially so quickly) from Shaw. So kudos to SHAW for the timely response. The following is my email exchange with them:

    Hello. I am hoping to get a statement from SHAW as to where they stand on the Net Neutrality debate. Most specifically their stance on the user-based bandwidth charging.

    The response I received back as follows:

    For an official comment as to our stance towards UBB, I recommend that you call our corporate office directly at 403-750-4500 or complete the Customer Feedback form at shaw.ca, as this goes directly to our corporate office.

    I can provide you with some details however, with regards to our current practices. Shaw has always reserved the right to charge for usage, although since the deployment of our far more robust usage tracking methods, we have modified our practices and moved away from hard caps (reduce your usage, upgrade your plan or cancel your account). Whereas high-usage users were almost previously considered to be abusers of our services, we realized that was not really the best approach; these users (about 10% of our internet customer base) were really high-value customers and so we have now enabled two additional options: per-GB billing (after at least two clear notifications on the bill/by phone) or data packs ($5 for 10GB, $20 for 60GB and $50 for 250GB).

    To address a possible speculative correlation between the recent CRTC ruling (and proposed government review/reversal), our UBB framework and this ruling are entirely unrelated. The co-incidence is happenstance. The ruling in question relates specifically to Bell’s ability to charge their resellers by the GB and not their ability (or any other ISP’s) ability to charge flat rates or by the GB (or a combination of both as we do).

    If you have any questions of a different nature or if there is anything else that we can do for you Kyle, please feel free to reply to this email and we will be happy to help.

    E-Care Team
    Shaw Cablesystems GP

    Whether or not their stance will change with the ruling is unclear. It was my understanding from the CRTC information that UBB would apply to all ISP’s. Perhaps this is a question that will only be answered once and for all when the CRTC ruling comes down on March 1st. Watch for further updates!

    SEO news blog post by @ 10:46 pm

    Categories: Net Neutrality,Uncategorized
    Tags: ,

     

    February 3, 2011

    Net Neutrality in the Great White North…UPDATE!

    As I was reading through headlines this morning after publishing my previous post regarding the Net Neutrality debate, I cam across the following on
    slashdot.org:

    Posted by “theshowmecanuck”

    “The Prime Minister of Canada and the Minister of Industry are set to reverse a ruling by the CRTC (Canadian Radio and Television Commission) allowing big Cable and Telecom companies to charge based on bandwidth usage. The ruling applied to both retail customers and smaller ISPs buying bandwidth wholesale from the major companies. The head of the CRTC has been called to testify before cabinet on why they want to allow the big internet providers to do this.”

    In this case the elected government agrees with the very large number of angry Canadians that this was bad for competition. Most Canadians see this as a bureaucracy aided cash grab with very suspect timing since companies like Netflix are starting to move into the Canadian market (big cable companies lowered caps and increased usage fees a week before Netflix started Canadian operations). The CRTC has a fair number of ex-industry executives on the board.”

    He stated that his source is www.thestar.com, yet when I read the article, I see the following statement in which the article from “the Star” contradicts itself by saying:

    “The promise to reverse the ruling comes as CRTC Chair Konrad von Finckenstein is scheduled to explain the decision Thursday before the House of Commons industry committee.”

    http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/932571–ottawa-to-reverse-crtc-decision-on-internet-billing?bn=1

    They say it is a “PROMISE” nothing more. I see no official releases from the CRTC to verify that a decision has been made. My understanding is that they have until March 1, before making a ruling. I don’t think this is over just yet.

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:03 pm

    Categories: Net Neutrality
    Tags: ,

     

    Net Neutrality in the Great White North

    As you have probably heard, the ongoing debate over Net Neutrality has been heating up the Great White North in the last few weeks.

    There has been a large amount of anger and public outrage over the CRTC’s recent (Canadian Radio-Television Telecommunications Commission) decision to allow for usage based billing. Major ISPs such as SHAW, Telus and Primus have of course, been strong supporters and are only too happy to accept the new ruling.

    It seems to be such a contentious issue for so many people, yet so many of us have no real idea of what net neutrality is, or how it impacts us as individuals (watch for an upcoming post by Beanstalk to help de-mystify Net Neutrality). Despite all the apparent anger, no one really seems to understand what this means to them personally or to the internet as a whole. With so much misinformation people are not even sure what they are getting worked up about. All they know is that it will now cost money to download all those wonderful torrents that they previously enjoyed for free.

    Is capping bandwidth simply a money grab for ISPs with the CRTC ruling in favour of business over individuals? What about those businesses that rely on the transfer of encrypted data transfers continuously to run and operate?

    Now this is where the issue really starts to heat up. If you forego your cable TV service with Shaw but still have internet service through them, what happens when you have a subscription to Netflix and watch only streaming movies? You are now paying for your Netflix subscription as well as being changed for the extra bandwidth. Savvy?

    IMO, I don’t mind being charged for downloads over 1GB if they are torrents (something my son may disagree with). With ISPs talking about about charging $2/GB, that could add up fast for harcore torrent fiends. Considering an average torrent movie size is about 1GB (for non-HD or Blu-Ray), that’s still a lot cheaper than going to rent the same movie at the local video store. Personally, I would like to see XX number of GB alotted in your monthly service agreement with your ISP and be charged a higher premium once you exceed that amount.

    Video rental stores have been dropping like flies, so maybe the new CRTC ruling will have people start going back to their local video stores and start renting movies again, or maybe people will start going to movie theatres more and help to provide an influx of revenue into local economies.

    As Canadians, we need to calmly look at both sides of the issues and really weigh the pros and cons. People get very emotional, especially when it affects their wallets. We have to take a step back and look at what is important in the grand scheme of things. The fact of the matter is that we live in a capitalist society. If I was an owner of an ISP, I would certainly look for ways to increase revenue for myself, my business and my employees. The important thing to remember is that there are two sides to every issue.

    Personally, I don’t have a problem with paying for premium services. By the same token I would like to see public Wi-Fi services available for free. Make no mistake, this is a hot issue and we certainly have not heard the last of it.

    More than 200,000 people have signed a petition organized by the Vancouver-based open communications advocacy group OpenMedia.ca against the CRTC decision. For those of you that would like to sign the petition against the CRTC ruling, have a look at http://stopthemeter.ca/

    The federal government will decide by March 1 whether to reject a CRTC decision on the usage-based internet billing, after Prime Minister Stephen Harper requested a review.

    SEO news blog post by @ 5:13 pm


     

    Level Triple-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
    Copyright© 2004-2013
    Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization, Inc.
    All rights reserved.