Translate:
Latest SEO Articles: Speaking At:
    Speaking at SMX London 2013
Follow Us:
Follow beanstalkseo on Twitter
Hear Us On:
Webmaster Radio
Blog Partner Of:
WebProNews Blog Partner
Helping Out:
Carbon balanced.
Archives
  • RSS

    XMLRSS

    Beanstalk's SEO News Blog

    At Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization we know that knowledge is power. That's the reason we started this SEO blog. We know that the better informed our visitors are, the better the decisions they will make for their websites and their online businesses. We hope you enjoy your stay and find the SEO news contained within this blog useful.


    August 1, 2012

    Red-Handed Face-Palm

    Facebook is making headlines again, but not the kind that Mark Zuckerberg would like.
    Mark Zuckerberg looking unhappy
    Earlier this week ‘Limited Run’, an e-commerce developer that used Facebook as part of it’s start-up media campaign, posted a report on their findings of click-through data from their Facebook ads.

    The data that Limited Run shared was a bit startling. In their own words:
    Facebook was charging us for clicks, yet we could only verify about 20% of them actually showing up on our site.

    Since data is all about who’s looking at it or how someone looks at it, the folks at Limited Run signed into a ‘handful’ of other tracking services and found the exact same thing.

    At this point you have a web developer who is very curious about something going on with their web traffic, so naturally they built an analytics system for their own site:
    Here’s what we found: on about 80% of the clicks Facebook was charging us for, JavaScript wasn’t on … in all of our years of experience, only about 1-2% of people coming to us have JavaScript disabled, not 80% like these clicks coming from Facebook.

    Limited Run is a start-up company, and the publicity from being the first to catch Facebook with it’s hand in the proverbial cookie jar of advertising money would certainly help ensure the company’s run isn’t so limited.

    Even still Limited Run was VERY careful to point out that there is little to no way of proving that Facebook is behind the bot -> ad traffic.

    They are however dropping Facebook’s advertising and their company page on FB because of a claim that FB was unwilling to assist them with a name change, “because they weren’t actively paying for $2k or more in campaigns”.

    Plus if 80% of the traffic from an advertising source is fake, and you have to pay for 100% of it, there’s better ways to promote your company.

    So as this was a smaller advertiser, not someone spending millions of ad revenue on Facebook, we took it as a one-off issue, until this morning when Forbes posted a link to an article on Macleans.ca about “blank” image advertising tests on Facebook.

    The gist of the piece is that a blank image test actually netted double the clicks of a static banner style image (think a logo or some non-promotion/non-offer) and only one click in ten thousand less than the average banner ad.

    Web Trends even jumped in to do some testing on the clicks to see if there was some sort of curious appeal to clicking on a blank image and by using heat maps and quizzes they confirmed that the traffic is not human.

    Facebook makes %85 of it’s ~$2.2 billion revenue from advertising traffic, and 14%-19% of FB revenue is from Zynga, a company that is suddenly involved in a stock crash scandal.
    Mark Pincus - Founder of Zynga Games
    If you hadn’t heard, just prior to some ugly profit reports for the company, the company Founder Mark Pincus, and key members of company, cashed out over $516 million in shares!

    Zynga share prices are currently at $2.83 each, way down from the $10 initial share price, and miles away from the $14.69 peak price of the company’s stock.

    It would appear for now that both companies have some explaining to do, and some problems to solve. For the users/subscribers this should be a wake up call on where you are spending your time and your advertising budgets.

    SEO news blog post by @ 10:28 am


     

    July 26, 2012

    SOPA Friends: Internet League of America

    The recording industry, agents, and vendors of music aren’t the only ones spending way too much of their profits on lobbying the government. Major internet companies that see the harm of bills like SOPA/PIPA are spending the time and money to fight back against this lobbying.

    Not to be confused with SuperFriends..

    This organization is less about crime and more about reasonable expenses for making sure government is making informed decisions.

    Google alone spent $3.9million in the second quarter of 2012, and $5.4million in 2012 total so far trying to help government see the internet as more than just a ‘series of tubes’.

    Google isn’t alone in fighting for your rights, Amazon’s spending between Jan 2012 and June 2012 was pegged at $1.34million, EBay spent nearly as much at $827k, and Facebook also jumped into the fight for $650k of lobbying.

    It stands to reason then that if they all had the same message a lot of time and money could be saved by joining forces, and this is how the Internet Association has come to be.

    With Google, Amazon, EBay and Facebook already signed into the Internet Association it’s already huge and it’s still in the ‘coming soon’ phase of setting up.

    This new group should not be confused with existing organizations like The Internet Defense League which are seeking other solutions to keeping people informed as to threats to online access/freedom.

    A few sites (RIAA partners?) are panning this as ‘evil‘ and un-Google for companies to work together to support a shared message to the government, but I think anyone who knows the extent of SOPA/PIPA and other bills will see that spin for what it really is, fear and loathing of anything that stands in the way of an easy profit.

    Google Fiber

    Google Fiber Appliances
    Remember us writing about Kansas City dark fiber, Google’s plans to light it up, and the various media/recording industry fears/objections?

    While I was composing this article on the new Internet Association I managed to eavesdrop on the details coming from the live broadcast at the launch of Google Fiber in Kansas this morning.

    Google Fiber Announcement Center

    Here’s what I caught (again this was just details I overheard and not officially published):

    • Google Fiber is run right to your house
    • A fiber-conversion firewall appliance converts the optical signal
    • The Google fiber-wall has built in WiFi and 4 gigabit RJ45 ports
    • The WiFi radio is very fast (no specs given) and features a guest portal system
    • Google Fiber offers TV boxes that act as WiFi boosters
    • The TV boxes stream Netflix/Youtube in HD quality with more options to follow
    • Google’s TV boxes work with Bluetooth headphones and can be controlled by Bluetooth devices
    • Currently purchasing a TV box will including a free Nexus 7 Tablet that acts as a remote control for the TV box.
    • $300 is mentioned as the ‘construction fee’ to send a Google rep to your home to install the fiber cable.
    • $120/mth for the TV and Gigabit Internet package (on 2 year contracts the $300 fee is waived)
    • $70/mth for just Gigabit fibre internet (no install fee for 1yr contracts)
    • $Free/mth 5mbps down, 1mbps up, of capped fiber access to anyone who wants to pay the $300 install fee
    • The free service option is guaranteed for anyone in the service area for 7 years
    • You can pay the $300 fee off over time if you wish as an incentive to connect everyone regardless of income levels
    • 1TB of Google Drive storage (directly linked to the Fibre) comes with the $70/mth and up packages
    • No mention of monthly data use caps, but they would need to be fairly generous

    Google Fiber Building in Kansas
    Apparently they are deciding which homes get fiber first by running a lobbying contest where they reward the communities that lobby other communities the most. The speaker tried to sell this as ‘doing it for Kansas’ and ‘spreading the word about what fiber really means’, but of all the announcements, there was no applause for
    this.

    Clearly most of Kansas is tired of waiting for Google Fiber and would like to start actually using it vs. running around ‘competing’ with other communities for the first chance to get hooked up.

    It’s an odd move for Google but you have to respect that they had to find a fair way to select the first communities to get connected.

    UPDATE: They have published the official Google Fiber data plans and yes, there’s NO DATA CAPS. Wow.

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:25 am


     

    July 20, 2012

    Gearing Up for Social Media Marketing

    Image: freedigitalphotos.net

    Different demographics are using different social media channels. Reaching the right audience with social media is about using the right channels and voice to connect with and engage your followers. Different sites as well as online marketing and analysis techniques can help you connect with the audience you’ve been trying to reach. Below is information about common social media networks and their audiences so you can gear each channel towards the demographic and sectors of your potential audience that uses it most.

    Facebook

    There are a number of infographics and articles online with information about who is using Facebook. Knowing that the average person visits the site 40 times per month may not be the information. Here is breakdown of who is using Facebook and how to connect with them:

    • People from the ages of 18-44 are using Facebook the most. This means you’re information needs to be broad enough to reach and connect with most of your audience, but not so broad that no one takes interest. Posting information about news topics related to your field and asking open-ended questions are two of the best ways to do this.
    • Though the 20- and 30-somethings are some of the most active on Facebook, people over the age of 45 are becoming more frequent users. If your products relate to the older demographic, share information they can relate to. If your services are for those in their early 20’s, share that.
    • Because the Facebook audience is so broad, use Facebook Insights to see who is on your page and talking about your company. Gaining knowledge of your key demographics can help you provide content that will encourage more interaction and engagement.

    Twitter

    Like Facebook, Twitter had a wide range of users. Men and women use the site pretty equally, though a large majority of Twitter users include African Americans and Hispanics. People are more likely to buy from a company the follow on Twitter than from one they don’t so reaching your audience on Twitter is an important factor for both online engagement and overall sales.

    • Most Twitter users live in urban areas. If your business is based in a well-populated city, turn your Tweets to reaching those in the same city and other urban areas.
    • Because Twitter now has targeted promoted tweets, you can reach a specific audience. You aren’t tweeting to all your followers, unless you choose to do so. You are instead, placing the tweet in front of the audience you want to reach.
    • Programs like SocialBro provide insight into who your audience is and when they are online. Knowing the material that will relate most to your audience as well as the right times will help you refine your Twitter strategies to reach new people.
    • Many tweets are now coming from smartphones and 1 in 5 smartphone owners use Twitter on their phones. Sharing and tweeting comments that can be viewed quickly via a smartphone could increase your Twitter traction.

    Pinterest

    Pinterest, at the moment, has a more focused audience. Composed mostly of women, top interests of this image-driven site include crafts, gifts, hobbies, interior design and fashion. Brands based in these areas should be devoting a decent amount of time to their Pinterest efforts. Even if your business doesn’t seem to be a fit, your company’s Pinterest can succeed.

    • A top geographical location of Pinterest users is the East South Central United States, which includes Mississippi, Alabama, Kentucky and Tennessee. Posting images that people of this region can relate to and take interest can lead to more engagement on your Pinterest boards.
    • Women compose nearly 80% of Pinterest account holders. Regardless of your brand, gearing images toward women is a great tactic.
    • See what’s trending and consider how your business can relate. Because Pinterest is open to a wide variety of images and information, focusing on what the users are pinning at the moment can gear your boards and pins in the right direction.

    Tumblr

    Tumblr combines blogging and image-sharing to create a unique site that’s perfect for social bloggers. Men and women use the site pretty equally. One of the most surprising demographics is the age. According to an infographic from Mashable, over half the site’s users are under the age of 34, with 18% of the total users being under the age of 18. Fitting your company into Tumblr means targeting content to a younger audience.

    • Because the age group is so young, gearing content to trending topics and information a person around the age of 20 can relate to is a great way to gain a following. Use common tags and popular images to increase traffic.
    • Some of the most tagged terms on Tumblr include gif, “LOL” and fashion, though art and vintage are other common tags. Use these as they relate to your business and content to gain new followers.
    • See which of your posts, reblogs and other content receive the most traction. What tags lead to followers? What content generates the most buzz? Measure your progress so you can easily make adjustments.

    All social media sites are about connecting. On Facebook, you can connect with people of all ages and from all backgrounds. Twitter is used by people in urban areas who want a quick and constant stream of information. Pinterest appeals to women and Tumblr to a younger demographic. With each social media site, research who likes and follows your company to see which audience is the most engaged with your company on that channel. As you figure out what your audience is on each channel, you can gear the content towards them for more successful social media campaigns.

    Author:
    Erica Bell is a small business writer who focuses on topics such as telemarketing and social media trends. She is a web content writer for Business.com.

    SEO news blog post by @ 11:08 am


     

    July 11, 2012

    Google Puts Smack-Down on Infographics

    Whether you know what they are called or not, most of us have seen those wonderful images that depict information in a pleasing graphical format and usually span 20 pages vertically. Infographic are visual representations that display information, data or knowledge. For some time now, these infographics have been used as link bait and are all the rage because they offer content in an easily digestible format.

    google smash

    In a recent interview by Eric Enge, Matt Cutts stated that Google feels they are being abused as a link building tactic and will be soon be discounted. Mr. Cutts when on to state:

    "This is similar to what people do with widgets as you and I have talked about in the past. I would not be surprised if at some point in the future we did not start to discount these infographic-type links to a degree. The link is often embedded in the infographic in a way that people don’t realize, vs. a true endorsement of your site."

    "In principle, there’s nothing wrong with the concept of an infographic." Cutts told Enge. "What concerns me is the types of things that people are doing with them. They get far off topic, or the fact checking is really poor. The infographic may be neat, but if the information it’s based on is simply wrong, then its misleading people."

    Of course this is indicative of a much larger problem of trying to obtain accurate information and statistics from the internet. While it is unlikely that the value of Infographics won’t be completely abolished, the same rule apply to content on your website; if you expect people to link back to your site based on your infographic, you will need to ensure that it is:

    • Relevant to your industry and to your visitors.
    • Offers accurate sources for acquired information/statistics.
    • Gives the viewer new information, tells them how to do something, or describes a process.
    • Free of spammy content and meta information.

    "Any infographics you create will do better if they’re closely related to your business and it needs to be fully disclosed what you are doing," Cutts advised.
    Similar to what happened with Squidoo lenses, we are seeing another web-trend that has been over-used and abused by online marketers and now we are seeing the resulting smack-down from Google.

    Like all other web trends, it is not so much a question of the usefulness of the trend, but how long it will take Google to devalue the tactic once it becomes abused. Any tactic that attemps to garner backlinks must always relevant to the user, rich in content, and be free of nefarious ploys to abuse the tactic.

    By employing only white-hat tactics, any strategies or tactics you employ will allow you to weather the storms of any Google updates. It is this practice that has allowed Beanstalk SEO Inc. to pass through barrage of Panda & Penguin updates unscathed to consitently maintain our rankings.

    SEO news blog post by @ 12:03 pm

    Categories: Google,Google,social media
    Tags:

     

    July 4, 2012

    Understanding Open Graph Protocol

    I have been asked several times recently about "what is an Open Graph?" and "How do I use it?" Not having a clear answer, I decided to educate myself so I could share the knowledge.

    facebook social graph

    The Open Graph protocol is widely implemented by Google and Facebook and in use on large websites such as IMDb, Microsoft, NHL, Time, Yelp and an increasing multitude of other sites. The Open Graph protocol was originally created at Facebook and is inspired by Dublin Core, link-rel canonical, Microformats, and RDFa.

    The Open Graph is a protocol that enables any web page to become a rich object in a social graph. At the center of Facebook’s core is a technology called the Social Graph, which Facebook uses to allow any web page to have the same functionality as any other object on Facebook.

    Although there are many other technologies, protocols and schemas that exist that could have been adopted to accomplish a similar technique, there is no single technology that provides enough information to richly represent any web page within the social graph. The Open Graph protocol effectively brings these existing technologies together to offer a unified, simple and powerful way to turn web pages into graph objects.

    Facebook’s Graph API allows web sites to draw information from a variety of sources including photos, events, pages and even their relationship between each other. This allows the social graph concept to envelop more than just relationships between individuals to include virtual non-human objects between individual as well.

    Making use of the open graph requires the developer to place four basic meta data in the section of the webpage’s html source code:

    • og:title – The title of your object as it should appear within the graph, e.g., “The Rock”.
    • og:type – The type of your object, e.g., “video.movie”. Depending on the type you specify, other properties may also be required.
    • og:image – An image URL which should represent your object within the graph.
    • og:url – The canonical URL of your object that will be used as its permanent ID in the graph, e.g., “http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117500/”.

    As an example, the following code is used by IMDB.com for the movie "The Rock"



    <html prefix="og: http://ogp.me/ns#">
    <head>
    <title>The Rock (1996)</title>
    <meta property="og:title" content="The Rock" />
    <meta property="og:type" content="video.movie" />
    <meta property="og:url" content="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0117500/" />
    <meta property="og:image" content="http://ia.media-imdb.com/images/rock.jpg" />
    ...
    </head>
    ...
    </html>

    The Open Graph protocol enables you to integrate your web pages into the social graph. It is currently designed for web pages representing profiles of real-world things — things like movies, sports teams, celebrities, and restaurants. Once your pages become objects in the graph, users can establish connections to your pages as they do with Facebook Pages. Based on the structured data you provide via the Open Graph protocol, your pages show up richly across Facebook: in user profiles, within search results and in News Feed.

    SEO news blog post by @ 12:22 pm


     

    June 11, 2012

    The Google/Netflix Internet Land Grab

    There are indications of an apparent paradigm shift occurring with how your favorite streaming content is delivered to you. There appears to be a “land grab” by large corporations to move their servers next to their ISPs networking infrastructure in order to minimize lag and increase profits.

    land grab game

    In a typical setup, when you want to watch a YouTube video, your traffic get sent across your ISP servers, over the internet then to the website’s data center (where the movie is) and then sends the data back to your ISP and then to your computer.

    There is a growing move by large content delivery networks to move to a more streamlined infrastructure by moving CDNs to the ISPs. This allows companies such as Google and Comcast to save a lot of money in bandwidth traffic charges from their ISPs by reducing the amount of bandwidth required by these services and the ability to speed up the delivery of the content to consumers. Reports indicate that as many as 100 CDNs are looking to move theirs servers to a co-location setup with service providers.

    Google has been making the move with its own content delivery network for several years now, and Netflix has just announced that it will be following suit in their Netflix Open Content Delivery Network. Over 70% of all Netflix traffic is being served in through server’s setup directly at several ISPs. Prior to January all of their traffic was being distributed through CDN companies such as Level 3, Akamai and Limelight.

    CDN Traffic

    The Internet is in its Golden Age of video. There is such a large volume of traffic being generated from online video and movie providers that many networks are striking up deals directly with the ISPs themselves to get as close to the source as possible. Video providers such as Netflix can lower their operating costs by paying less for bandwidth and be able to deliver content at higher speeds (and even HD content). However, it is only the largest content providers that can afford to do so, which inevitably forces out the smaller players in the market, squashing all competition.

    Editor of StreamingMedia.com Dan Rayburn doesn’t call it a land rush.“Apple, Microsoft, Facebook, and others are doing this,” stated Rayburn, “There are a handful of companies that are large enough,” he says. “But you have to be a certain sized company doing enough traffic.”

    Andy Ellis, chief security officer with Akamai agrees that companies are moving to cache their content locally with ISPs, but stated that there are many services such as security and analytics that Akamai can sell them. “I don’t think we’re yet seeing a land rush into the ISPs,” he says. “I think you have to be really, really big to be interesting enough to the ISPs.”

    On the surface, this could sound disastrous for third party CDNs, but we have seen time and again how competition can keep the marketplace robust and lower prices for the consumer.

    SEO news blog post by @ 12:04 pm


     

    June 9, 2012

    Social Media Camp – Fred Sarkari

    The keynote start with an interesting fact.  The average infant laughs 483 times per day.  An adult … 11.

    Alright … let’s begin.

    Social Media Camp

    Keynote: What Is Social Media?

    Fred Sarkari is the keynote speaker.  Her reminds us of some issues with social media:
    Social media is a crutch.  Don’t forget the human element.  Too many business ignore the human element in exchange for social media.

    There are three possible outcomes from a social media presence:

    1. Opportunity
    2. Opportunity passes you by
    3. Opportunity ruins your business

    Warning: the human mind views success as being busy.  Too many people measure social media as a success when they are spending too much time on it.

    It’s important to understand that we are no different than children.  We make decisions based on emotion and justify with logic.  When engaging in social media you need to understand that people are viewing with emotion.  Not everything needs to be perfect – we are human.

    Similarly – we need to ask ourselves the same question children do … “Why?”  When engaging in social media it’s better then to do one or two things well than many poorly so ask “Why?” when looking at a new platform.

    Rules For Social Media:

    1. Build relationships.  You can be replaced … your relationships can’t.  You need to be willing to put yourself on the line, express who you are and communicate with your audience honestly.
    2. Don’t be an ego collector.  Numbers don’t mean success.  You can buy fans but they’ll never buy from you.
    3. Invite eyeballs to home base.  Real interested visitors can pull their social traffic to their website/blog/etc.
    4. The BBQ effect.  Friends of friends are qualified/liked and trusted.  But if you turn on your fiends and try to sell them … they’ll feel betrayed.  Use social media to build trust and respect.  Invite them to your BBQ to meet you … the rest will follow.
    5. Be found.  Content, don’t post useless information (personal note – please please please listen to this one if I’m on your Follower list.  I don’t care that you’re having a coffee at Starbucks).  Gear your updates to what your audience is looking for.
    6. Partnerships.  They’re dangerous if you don’t develop the right partnerships but one or two of the right ones will change your business.
    7. Social media is like a cocktail.  If you order a cocktail you don’t want it diluted with ice.  Similarly, your followers don’t want your updates diluted with useless filler.
    8. Ask yourself: if you could be found by one specific person … how would you describe them?
    9. Return.  We spend so much time and resources getting people to us, don’t lose them.  Give them what they want.
    10. Do: Inspire people.  Educate people based on what they do, not what you do.  Help them execute their needs.
    11. Resources. What resources do I have?  Make sure you allocate them effectively.

    Overall a very good presentation.  Covered the basics but sometimes a reminder there is spot on. :)

    SEO news blog post by @ 9:39 am


     

    June 7, 2012

    Gaming The Facebook IPO Game

    I like numbers and I like stats.  I suppose that’s what attracts me to SEO and that whole “algorithm thing” so much.  Our regular blog readers will remember my rant on May 18th on the Facebook IPO over-valuation where I compare Facebook’s stock prices vs revenue with Ford, valuing Ford at well over $2 trillion dollar if they got the same kind of multiples as Facebook does.  Unfortunately Ford has to exist in the real world where they’re expected to base their company worth on revenue.  What a novel concept.  But that rants done so on to a fun game …

    As I’m sure you can all imagine I’ve been watching Facebook’s share prices regularly (dare I say … hourly).  I definitely feel sorry for investors but there is part of me that feels a bit better about the state of the economy knowing that Facebook’s stock is dropping to perhaps what it should be.  It’s still got a ways to go there though.  That said, watching the stock has revealed some interesting insight that I might even jump on if I had a risk-tolerance high enough to view my capital as Monopoly money.  Because I don’t really understand the stock market and just like playing with numbers however I’m not about to do that, but thought I’d share an interesting bit of data.

    Facebook stock is following (generally) a trend, or at least has been for the past week.  Let’s say you like to day trade and you have $10,000 to play with.  If you buy each day at 2PM and sell each day at 3PM it would result in (note: I’m assuming a $0 transaction fee as those vary):

    May 31st (start of day – $10,000)
    At 2PM you’d buy 370 shares at $27.02 costing $9,997.40
    At 3PM you’d sell for $28.20 for $10,434.00

    June 1 (start of day – $10,436.70)
    At 2PM you’d buy 376 shares at $27.75 costing $10,434.00
    At 3PM you’d sell for $27.84 for $10,467.84

    June 4 (start of day – $10,863.75)
    At 2PM you’d buy 407 shares at $26.67 costing $10,854.69
    At 3PM you’d sell for $27.22 for $11,078.54

    June 5 (start of day – $11,087.60)
    At 2PM you’d buy 419 shares at $26.41 costing $11,065.79
    At 3PM you’d sell for $26.17 for $10,965.23

    June 6 (start of day – $10,987.04)
    At 2PM you’d buy 420 shares at $26.11 costing $10,966.20
    At 3PM you’d sell for $26.79 for $11,251.80

     

    At the end of the week your investment of $10,000 would have you sitting at $11,272.64.  Not bad – over 11% return in a week.

    I noticed this while having a chat with a friend of mine (my WebmasterRadio.fm co-host Jim Hedger) when Facebook had dropped further at around 11am one day and I said it’s a good time to buy as it’ll go up by the end of the day.  I decided to actually look at the trends as my thought was based just on an instinct at what I’d seen without paying attention.  Turns out I’d have been wrong that day and I was muddling my data from casual glances but if you actually look at the flow of value, there is one.  Some days you’ll come out behind but overall – you’ll come out over 11% richer.  had you bought at the lowest and sold at the highest points in a day of course you’d have made more but saying that is like saying drinking water will keep you hydrated.

    I have to note this is just a fun analysis and not meant to be taken as any kind of advice.  I’m not buying shares nor do I plan to.  I expect the stock price to fall overall in the coming months and either way, I’m not a stock investor.  I say this so you won’t take this as any type of advice or think, “hey, I’m going to do that”.  Doing so would be akin to taking the advice of an SEO on how to win the Tour de France, I’m sure I could come up with statistical tips for you there to but a knowledgeable trainer is always better so if you’re thinking of investing in Facebook, get the advice of a qualified professional.  If you ask me – as a long term investment it’ll only be good for a loss in your books.

    Follow Up:

    To see if things progress along the same path, I’ve decided to track that $10,000 through the week after this post.  Each day I will be updating this post with the 2PM buy and 3:00 sell metrics.

    June 7 (start of day – $11,272.64)
    You’d buy 421 shares at $26.72 costing $11,249.12
    At 3PM you’d sell for $27.07 for $11,396.47

    June 8 (start of day – $11,419.99)
    You’d buy 422 shares at $27.05 costing $11,415.10
    At 3PM you’d sell for $27.02 for $11,402.44
    * interesting note – last Friday it picked up around 3:15 too but I don’t want to change my numbers for Friday’s so we’ll stick with the 2PM to 3PM strategy as the numbers below continue.

    June 11 (start of day – $11,407.33)
    You’d buy 411 shares at $27.70 costing $11,384.70
    At 3PM you’d sell for $27.30 for $11,220.30

    Interesting to note – it appears that the first day of the week Facebook spikes first thing in the morning and then drops through the day.  If I continue monitoring this one after this week is up I may well adjust the numbers to just a buy at 3PM with a sale at 9:30 the following day.  Not quite as slick at the 2PM to 3Pm standard but we’ll see how that works through this week.  :)

    June 12 (start of day – $11,242.93)
    You’d buy 415 shares at $27.05 costing $11,225.75
    At 3PM you’d sell for $27.21 for $11,292.15

    June 13 (start of day – $11,309.33)
    You’d buy 411 shares at $27.45 costing $11,281.95
    At 3PM you’d sell for $27.16 for $11,162.76

    So – if you followed my ill-conceived advice you’d have made $1,272.64 in week one.  In week two you’d have lost $109.88.

    For the next 5 business days we’re going to go with the same 2 to 3 buy/sell pattern but I’m going to take the leap and say, “It happened twice so it’s a pattern” and on Monday I’ll be tracking the buy at 3PM instead of two and hold on until Tuesday at 9:30.  I’ll then track the buy again on Tuesday at 2 for a sale at 3.

    It’s interesting to note that after 2 weeks we’d have a 11.16% gain in revenue.  Had we simple purchased once at 2PM on May 31st (the first day in this example) and sold at 3PM on June 13th you’d have gained 0.05%.

    So stay tuned for more bad advice. :)

    Week Three:

    Because I started monitoring this on the 31st of May (a Thursday) this is the first day of week three.  This week I’m sticking to the 2PM buy and 3PM sell rate I’ve been using thus far with one minor adjustment, on the first day of the week I’ll be buying at 3PM and won’t sell until 9:30AM the next day.  So on the second day of the week there will actually be two sales.

    June 14 (start of day – $11,190.33)
    You’d buy 403 shares at $27.73 costing $11,175.19
    At 3PM you’d sell for $27.71 for $11,167.13

    June 15 (start of day – $11,182.27)
    You’d buy 386 shares at $28.90 costing $11,155.40
    At 3PM you’d sell for $29.21 for $11,275.06

    June 18 (start of day – $11,301.93)
    You’d buy 357 shares at $31.65 costing $11,299.05
    On the 19th at 9:30am you’d sell for $31.53 for $11,256.21.

    June 19 (start of buying – $11,259.09)
    You’d buy 353 shares at $31.89 costing $11,257.17
    At 3PM you’d sell for $31.76 for $11,211.28

    I’m going to stop now as here’s what’s clear … you shouldn’t follow my advice on investing.  My insistence on watching trends and keeping a toe-hold in reality makes me ill equipped to be an investor.

    Had you invested $11,272.64 on June 7th at 2PM you’d have purchased 421 shares at $26.72.  If you followed my advice that would have turned into $11,213.20 losing you $59.44.  If you just sold at 3PM today you’d have turned that $11,272.64 into $13,370.96.  So in essence, if you’d followed my advice you’d have lost $2,157.76.

    And that’s why it’s a better idea to leave things to the experts. :)

    SEO news blog post by @ 7:10 am


     

    June 5, 2012

    Google Advisor: Where have you been all my life?

    Admittedly, when I read the announcement that Google Advisor was here to help me manage my money the first thoughts were about privacy and that last bastion of private information Google hasn’t touched yet: Banking.

    Gloved hand that is reaching for banking and credit info

    Being wrong never felt so good!

    Google Advisor is not (at the moment) a way to suck more private information from you, it’s actually more of a consulting service for comparing bank accounts, credit cards, certificates of deposit, and more.

    Google Advisor

    As someone who’s setup review sites for various services/offerings I can tell you how handy/popular it is to break down competing services so the consumer can select something that meets their exact needs.

    Google Advisor claims that the information it’s showing is based on my data, but a 0% intro rate on transfers for 18months? If that’s really available to me I’m going to have to send Google some chocolates.

    Google bought QuickOffice

    QuickOffice Logo

    Google bought the mobile office suite ‘QuickOffice‘ which allows ‘App-Level’ access to office documents for mobile devices based on Android/iOS/Symbian.

    This move seems redundant with Google’s ‘Docs’ suite offering even more connectivity to your documents/spreadsheets/presentations, but that is just a cloud service, not an ‘App’ and you can have more offline control of your work if you have an ‘App’ vs. a cloud service.

    Plus you can’t argue with the users, they want ‘Apps’ and will pay for them.

    Google bought Meebo

    Meebo Logo

    I’m not sure if this was related to Yahoo’s ‘Axis’ bar plugin that came and went with zero fanfare, but it’s an interesting purchase for SEO interests.

    Meebo is a handy social media tool with some great options for ad placement and on-line marketing. SEOs not already dabbling with the tool should take a look, like yesterday.

    If you’ve been managing your Twitter, Google+, Facebook, etc.., profiles without a management tool, aggregation sites like Meebo are really what you’ve been missing out on.

    We know that Google owned properties have more relevance and trust on the web than similar services/products. After all, if you can’t trust yourself, who can you trust?

    So if you were using some other social aggregation tool, and were doing it solely for SEO awareness, you can safely assume it’s worth the effort to try out Meebo for a potentially improved result/relevance from your efforts.

    We will be doing some testing (as we always do) and will blog about our results to further expand on what the service offers over others. This may even warrant an article or two?

    SEO news blog post by @ 12:42 pm


     

    June 1, 2012

    Facebook Losing $2,373,373.37 Per Minute



    Today’s post will be a short one, a followup on my rant on May 18th in which I discussed a value comparison of Facebook’s IP vs Ford discussing their Market Cap (total company valuation) based on their real-world earnings.  For our regular blog readers or listeners to my weekly show on Webcology on WebmasterRadio.fm you’ll know that I’m flabbergasted and a bit disgusted by the valuations being flung around for internet companies.  Don’t get me wrong, I think the Internet is an awesome place but to value a company like Facebook at 21.4 times annual revenue is just … not right.  Turns out … investors and I daresay the rest of the world agrees.

    So today my good friend Rob Gagnon of Xoomfile asked me via Skype, “So how much per minute is Facebook losing right now?”  That of course got my curiosity up and after a titch of quick math (total loss in Market valuation divided by the number of hours since the IPO went live (333 to the time of this writing) I came up with $2,373,373.37 per hour in lost valuation.  That’s $39,556.22 every second or over $47 billion since May 18th when the IPO began.

    While I can sympathize with the losses investors are taking, if we take a step back and look at how we’re valuing companies … this outsider is pretty confident we’ll continue to see additional drops in Facebook and likely other tech companies with valuations this far outside of any reasonable revenue vs valuation multiplier.  Basically, we need toa sk ourselves … what would this company be worth if we didn’t view capital as Monopoly money and instead looked at the numbers as opposed of the hype.

    SEO news blog post by @ 8:41 am

    Categories: Facebook,IPO
    Tags:

     

    « Newer PostsOlder Posts »
    Level Triple-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
    Copyright© 2004-2013
    Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization, Inc.
    All rights reserved.