Translate:
Latest SEO Articles: Speaking At:
    Speaking at SMX London 2013
Follow Us:
Follow beanstalkseo on Twitter
Hear Us On:
Webmaster Radio
Blog Partner Of:
WebProNews Blog Partner
Helping Out:
Carbon balanced.
Archives
  • RSS

    XMLRSS

    Beanstalk's SEO News Blog

    At Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization we know that knowledge is power. That's the reason we started this SEO blog. We know that the better informed our visitors are, the better the decisions they will make for their websites and their online businesses. We hope you enjoy your stay and find the SEO news contained within this blog useful.


    June 16, 2010

    Reciprocal Links … again

    As they mentioned over on SE Round Table – the discussion regarding reciprocal links has been had hundreds – and maybe even thousands of times.  At least once per week I get asked about them either whether they’re part of what we do or if te person on the phone should do them, etc. etc.

    I won’t pretend to have the hard-and-fast answer that is true 100% of the time ind in fact – my belief is that there is no answer that is right 100% of the time.  It’s one of those pesky times where one has to use their common sense.  Rather than trying to find a hard-and-fast “recip links work” or “recip links don’t work” one should rather look at each link and ask, “should this link work?”  If you’re getting a link on a page with 143 links ranging from real estate to blue widgets then it doesn’t matter whether it’s recip or not – it shouldn’t be counted.  On the other hand, Beanstalk has a link on the WebProNews site where they’re references our blog posts, etc.  Similarly – I’ve also linked to them as a great resource.  Should these links be ignored because we happen to link to each other?  Are they recip links?

    Here’s the long-and-short of it:

    • Recip links are not in-and-of-themselves horrible if it’s an exchange of references with sites you’d actually recommend.
    • Recip links can be a royal pain to try to manage.  You might find one-way links easier in the long run
    • Recip links should NEVER be the only link strategy of a campaign.  Of course, the same can be said for any link building strategy.  A site that stands on one leg will soon fall.

    The debate continues over at Webmaster World at http://www.webmasterworld.com/link_development/4151507.htm.

    Good luck to you. :)

    SEO news blog post by @ 7:44 pm

    Categories: Recip Links
    Tags:

     

    June 2, 2010

    Mayday Mayday

    Google’s latest update is known among SEO’s lovingly as the “Mayday update”.   The update ended about a week ago and as with any update, there are winners and there are losers.  We known that the update was algorithmic and not index-based.  Basically, it has to do with the rankings of your site not the pages Google cares about.  Reportedly this update went through vigorous testing (we did see some back-and-forths for quite some time prior to the stabilization that occurred last week)  and Google likes what they see.  There is apparently no need for a “corrective update” to repair what went wrong as (according to Google’s Matt Cutts) the results are better for the update.

    The focus in the update was longtail phrases.  Rather than try to explain it all I’ll let the horse speak. (this is a reference to “from the horses mouth – not Matt :)

    You can read more from ex-Googler Vanessa Fox at http://searchengineland.com/google-confirms-mayday-update-impacts-long-tail-traffic-43054.

    And good luck !

    SEO news blog post by @ 5:16 pm

    Categories: Google
    Tags:

     

    May 25, 2010

    Beanstalk’s New Twitter Page

    Well I’ve finally joined the 21st century.  As many of my friend’s have mocked me for – I didn’t get involved with social media until only recently.  I have been a heavy user of Facebook for a while but I only have friends on my friends list (what a novel concept) and I’ve only been using Twitter for a few months.  I’ll admit that after many months of basically exclaiming that Twitter was nothing more than another time-sucking waste I’ve been partly converted.  It is a time-sucking waste but a useful one. :)

    I’ve had a Beanstalk page up on twitter for a few months.  We have 390 followers due in large part to the fact that I’m only following 330 people.  Why?  Well, because I still hang on to the belief that if I’m going to use Twitter I should keep it useful and to keep it useful I can’t have 8000 people all screaming their ads at me, cluttering up the comments from people I’m interested in.  I have many friends that I don’t follow simply because I’m not interested in their Twitter topic (not a “cat person” for example) and because I’m not overly concerned about increasing my follower numbers just for a sake of it.  If I want my information getting out there then it makes sense to follow people who are interested in my topic (SEO) that way the people who follow me are more likely to Retweet, etc.  Basically – I use it more as a communications tool so if I don’t follow you – don’t feel bad, you should only follow me if you’re actually interested in my Tweets too.

    So that’s been going on for a few months with over 1000 Tweets to my name – so why talk about his now?  Well, my good friend Kristine has just designed for us a fantastic Twitter background.  This replaces the tiles of pics of my kids that the page used to contain.  Need to express my sincere thanks to Kristine and highly recommend her if you need a new and professional Twitter background or some hand-coded site design work (note: highly talented there as well and that’s actually more how I know her).

    And of course – you’re welcome to follow us on Twitter (or just view our awesome new background at http://twitter.com/beanstalkseo.

    SEO news blog post by @ 9:20 pm

    Categories: Twitter
    Tags:

     

    May 19, 2010

    SEO Guarantees Should Not Exist … Really?

    An SEO I generally respect recently published a post on their blog titled, “SEO Guarantees Should Not Exist”.  Of course I felt the need to reply to this statement and the rational behind it.  First – let’s read the original post.  You can do so at http://www.searchengineoptimizationjournal.com/2010/04/23/guarantees/.  OK – now that you’re done reading, here is my reply to Nick. :)

    Hey Nick.

    Got your post sent to me in your newsletter and of course had to respond (Note to Beanstalk’s blog readers: incidentally the newsletter is worth subscribing to as generally I find Nick’s comments to be worthwhile and while I may disagree with him from time-to-time; he’s a solid SEO with some great advice).  Not to argue the point on guarantees (as that could be done ad nauseam and neither side is going to agree with the other) I do have to point out two fundamental flaws with your post.

    You quote Google with the following Q&A:

    Q – “Should I believe SEO agencies that promise to make my site rank first in Google in a few months and with a precise number of links?”
    A – Official Google Answer: No one can make that promise; therefore the short answer is no, you should not.”

    Stating that one cannot guarantee #1 is very different that guaranteeing top 10 or 20.  This logic is flawed as it uses one statement to prove a completely different argument.  I’m sure there are many companies offering guarantees that would agree that they cannot guarantee #1 and thus – they too would agree with Google but not with your post.

    Inherently I also have to disagree with the following statement:

    “Rankings in general as a measurement for SEO is an old flawed metric”

    Everyone is going to agree that there are other metrics BUT when it comes to SEO (and I’m talking pure SEO as defined by Dictionary.com as “The process of choosing targeted keywords and keyword phrases related to a Web site so the site will rank high when those terms are part of a Web search”) rankings are the measurement.

    Now – once you have the rankings (i.e. once your site is in front of people’s eyeballs) then yes – we need to look at ways to increase clickthrough rates of the site when it does appear and yes, we need to look at traffic and look for ways to improve conversions BUT this is not SEO.  SEO is the ranking of the site in the organic results and to not make measuring those rankings the core metric is just downright silly.  This is like saying, ” The purpose of the Olympics is to rank athletes but heck, isn’t their personal health the real measure?  Let’s just judge them by how long they live.”  I think we can all agreement that that would be a very unpopular decision and rightfully so – it’s measuring the wrong thing.

    Since pure SEO is the determining of appropriate keywords and then the ranking of them – rankings aren’t just a metric – they’re the metric.  Once attained we get into the myriad of other metric and let’s be clear – the real purpose of website promotion is the business that it generates and SEO is a piece of that.  It’s important to followup the SEO process with clickthrough rate optimization and analytics and testing when applicable but SEO, pure SEO, is about rankings.  It’s step one and rankings are the measurements.  To not use them is a disservice to the client and distorts what SEO really is.

    Past his however let’s be clear, guarantees can be misleading and rankings aren’t the whole story – I’ve seen sites rank well and perform poorly and vice-versa and I hold not ill-will to Nick – there’s a reason that I’m subscribed to his newsletter and obviously read it but if you’re ever told not to take ranking or that they’re irrelevant – you’re being mislead.  It’s not field of dreams, first you need to get in front of the visitor with rankings – then tweak that content to maximize the effectiveness of them.

    As an aside, you may rank for phrases you weren’t targeting, this is part of the SEO process as well when done correctly but rankings fo phrases you’re not tracking isn’t the same as not needing to track the phrases you’re targeting. :)

    SEO news blog post by @ 5:49 pm

    Categories: SEO Firms
    Tags: ,

     

    May 13, 2010

    Webcology Privacy Debate

    Today on Webcology Jim Hedger and I discussed privacy.  I should note that when it comes to privacy I have a fairly right-wing approach to most aspects of it (though not all).  Jim on the other hand tends to be a little more left-wing on the subject (reminding me of the Net Neutrality debate we’ve had numerous times). :)

    The discussion spanned Facebook and Google (with a little general issues in there) and started with the fact that Facebook has come under attack lately for selling information to third parties to advertising and has this included in their privacy policy.  Jim of course understands the desire to capitalize on the data but has issue with the practice of violating people’s privacy like this.  I don’t quite see it that way and here’s why …

    When you enter any information into an online source you are giving it to the world.  That’s about that.

    People seem to believe (falsely) that when they enter their information into Facebook (or any other online source for that matter) that the information is somehow only called on by their closes and dearest friends.  That somehow Facebook is the benevolent entity that is allowing developers to build tools around their system for the good of mankind and somehow shouldn’t profit.  And magically – there will never arise a situation where Facebook (or similar entity) has their data taken by hackers.  This belief by people that they can enter copious amount of personal data into Facebook assumign that Facebook is somehow collecting it for the good of all mankind actually annoys me.

    So the onus lies on …

    You.

    Who has hold of all the information that could be abused?  You do.  Facebook didn’t launch one day with all the information about everybody on the planet.  No – they just asked and you told them.  If we stop and ask ourselves, “Do I want the world to know this?” about the information we give away then the privacy issues won’t exist.  I’m OK with the world knowing I’m an SEO, I went to Cairine Wilson Secondary School, I watch Arrested Development and I play Bioshock 2.  Information that I wouldn’t want the whole world to know – never makes it into Facebook or any other social medium.

    I was lucky to have a father who was a political adviser and who is now a lawyer.  He would say, “Never write anything down you don’t want the wold to know.”  At the time he was referring to print but the same can be said for the digital world.  Don’t give your information to a  third party if you don’t want the world to know.  The onus lies with you – not them.  They have to protect their interests (profit) and you have to protect yours (privacy).

    Let’s also remember that capitalism has an uncanny way of self-regulating.  If your information is used for purposes you don’t approve of enough times – you will stop using the service.  So if Facebook violates your trust you will stop using Facebook and the slow and steady decline will begin.

    The exception to my rule …

    For the companies out there who think I’m given them an all-clear the are some exceptions.  I only put the onus on the individual when there is reasonable reason to believe you are giving the information away.  When I search on Google I know my behavior is being tracked (heck – they’re personalizing my results based on it) and then I enter my favorite shows into Facebook I know it’s being stored.  But what about pre-installed widgets and toolbars that come with your fancy new computer.  They can track your behavior but in my humble opinion – I believe this is where the scrutiny should lie.  If my new PC by default is monitoring my behavior, preferences and web patterns then this is private information and the consumer likely isn’t aware this is going on.  If they search int eh toolbar (for example) then it is the individuals responsibility but if it is data gathered when the individual likely didn’t know and and shouldn’t reasonably have known that data was being collected – herein lies the potential violation of implied privacy.

    But of course this is just my opinion.  The rule of the day though: Don’t write anything down you don’t want the world to know.

    SEO news blog post by @ 10:27 pm

    Categories: Privacy
    Tags: ,

     

    May 12, 2010

    Keyword Research Article

    The latest article published by Beanstalk SEO has just been added to our archives.  The article is titled, “Keyword Research Basics for SEO” and is exactly that.  For the experienced there will be little to glean from the article bu it gives a good outline of how to use keyword tools (specifically Google’s) to help assess what your possible targets are.  A followup article will be coming out in the next few days on competition analysis to help our readers turn that keyword research data into a useful SEO strategy.  To read the article just click the link above or visit our SEO articles archive for this and other useful publications.

    I’ll post here the second the new article is available and be sure to stay “tuned” – we’ve got some new writers who will be adding their voices to the Beanstalk blog in the next week with a  focus on bringing you more and up-to-date news and analysis.

    SEO news blog post by @ 7:49 pm


     

    May 5, 2010

    BOTW Discount & New Face For Google

    The first thing I’m going to discuss today is the discount being offered by my favorite paid directory Best Of The Web.  They always offer good value for the money in regards to both trust enhancement AND just plain old traffic but for the month of May they’re offering a $25 discount on submissions of both your site and your blog.  Both the Beanstalk site and blog are in there so I’m not recommending anything I wouldn’t put my own money behind.

    So if you’re looking for a good quality link from a solid and respected site, BOTW is a good place to head and I’d recommend doing so before the end of the month.  Submission is typical of  an advanced directory (find your category, click “Submit”). :)   They charge both annual and one-time fees depending on your short vs long term goals.  You can visit their site at http://botw.org/.

    Google’s New Face

    Some of you may have already noticed that Google is displaying their results differently with a left hand navigation allowing for some advanced tailoring of the search results.  I’ve actually been seeing it on my work computer for a couple weeks now on and off.  Basically the default results set is the same as always but with a click you can tailor your results by time, type (blog, regular, news, etc.) and they even offer suggestion additional searches to consider.

    As an SEO I of course have to consider that this is yet another factor in clickthroughs that I have to consider and that will likely put more work on my plate BUT on the plus side – t also may reduce the bounce rate of sites by allowing people to tailor their results more specifically.  Oh – and as a searcher I do like it which (I suppose) is what Google’s trying to do. :)   You can read Google’s post on the new face on their blog at http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/05/spring-metamorphosis-googles-new-look.html.

    Once again Google, you’ve made my life a little more complicated but I have to commend you on a job well done.

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:36 pm


     

    May 3, 2010

    Adobe CS5 Trials Available For Download

    For those of you who (like me) were waiting anxiously for CS5 trial versions to become available … you’re in for a treat. :)

    I just got my email from them announcing that the trial versions of the new suites are available and of course – I’ve just downloaded Dreamweaver to give it a test drive.  I’ll report on that another day as, well … I just downloaded it.  I can so far say the download was fast but that’s the only review I can do.

    You can get product information and download the trials off the Adobe website here and if you order by the end of the month you get free shipping. :)

    Do download the trial, give it a try and of course – watch the Beanstalk blog for more information. :)

    SEO news blog post by @ 6:42 pm

    Categories: SEO Tools
    Tags:

     

    April 30, 2010

    Beanstalk’s Blog Now In WordPress

    Well alas, it had to be done.  After years of touting the benefits of Blogger blogs and recommending client’s host their blogs there we’ve been forced to move by Google and their decision to discontinue support for FTP.  While it’s a shame to have been pushed out of blogger. Of course I’m still working out a few of the kinks BUT all-in-all it went pretty smoothly.

    For those facing the same dilema – here’s roughly what it took:

    1. Install WordPress.
    2. The easy way is to convert directly from your blogger account as Dusty illustrates on his blog at http://dustyreagan.com/convert-from-blogger-to-wordpress/ BUT I wasn’t able to go that route so I …
    3. Export your Blog (if you can’t use the method in Step 2).
    4. Using WordPress’ Import function (under Tools in the left nav)  you’ll have to convert your exported data to a WordPress format (since you can’t use the Blogger import if you’ve gone past step 2.  I was relieved to find an awesome tool at http://blogger2wordpress.appspot.com/ that worked wonderfully converting all the data exactly how it should.
    5. So now you have your blog working.  It’ll look different but all the information is there.  I then had to go into the files and edit the theme to look like the Beanstalk blog is supposed to but if you don’t have your blog matching your site and you’re happy with one of the countless themes available for WordPress – you’re done.  If not – you have to then manually convert your Blogger template to a WordPress template that requires a reasonable understanding of PHP.  I say reasonable as I’m in no way a PHP developer and I was able to do it in about 30 o 40 minutes with the tweaks and the addition of a couple new features that WordPress had that weren’t available in Blogger. :)
    6. Now all that’s left is to go through your backlinks and incoming traffic points and make sure to 301 all those link and entry points so you don’t lose link strength or annoy your visitors.  And don’t forget to 301 your feeds. :)

    And that’s all there is to it.  The total process including figuring out how to do it took about 1.5 to 2 hours.  I hope you have the same success or better. :)

    SEO news blog post by @ 5:54 pm

    Categories: Misc
    Tags: ,

     

    36 SEO Myths That Won’t Die But Need To

    A couple days ago I got my regular newsletter from Search Engine Land with an awesome article on SEO myths that just keep sticking around. If you’re an SEO you know what I’m talking about – those myths that you have to answer to every couple days and when you say it’s a myth, the client responds as if you’re an idiot because they heard it from some very knowledgeable person on a forum somewhere and that person had 37 posts so they must know a lot right?

    Well Stephan Spencer, Vice President of SEO Strategies at Covario wrote a great article on 36 myths and while I do tend to disagree with some of the assertions he makes (as I’m sure he woudl disagree with some of mine) it’s a highly worthwhile read. Below you’ll find his list but to read the full scoop you’ll just have to head over to read the full story on Search Engine Watch. The URL for that is below the list but first – here’s his 36 myths:

    1. Our SEO firm is endorsed/approved by Google.
    2. Don’t use Google Analytics because Google will spy on you and use the information against you.
    3. Your PageRank score, as reported by Google’s toolbar server, is highly correlated to your Google rankings.
    4. Having an XML Sitemap will boost your Google rankings.
    5. Since the advent of personalization, there is no such thing as being ranked #1 anymore because everyone sees different results.
    6. Meta tags will boost your rankings.
    7. It’s good practice to include a meta robots tag specifying index, follow.
    8. It’s helpful if your targeted keywords are tucked away in HTML comment tags and title attributes (of IMG and A HREF tags.)
    9. Having country-specific sites creates “duplicate content” issues in Google.
    10. You can keep search engines from indexing pages linked-to with Javascript links.
    11. Googlebot doesn’t read CSS.
    12. You should end your URLs in .html.
    13. You can boost the Google rankings of your home page for a targeted term by including that term in the anchor text of internal links.
    14. It’s important for your rankings that you update your home page frequently (e.g. daily.)
    15. Trading links helps boost PageRank and rankings.
    16. Linking out (such as to Google.com) helps rankings.
    17. It’s considered “cloaking” — and is thus taboo and risky — to clean up the URLs in your links selectively and only for spiders.
    18. If you define a meta description, Google uses it in the snippet. .
    19. The bolding of words in a Google listing signifies that they were considered in the rankings determination.
    20. H1 tags are a crucial element for SEO.
    21. There are some unique ranking signals for Google Mobile Search, and they include the markup being “XHTML Mobile”.
    22. SEO is a black art.
    23. The Disallow directive in robots.txt can get pages de-indexed from Google.
    24. SEO is a one-time activity you complete and are then done with. .
    25. Automated SEO is black-hat or spammy.
    26. A site map isn’t for people.
    27. There’s no need to link to all your pages for the spiders to see them. Just list all URLs in the XML Sitemap.
    28. Google will not index pages that are only accessible by a site’s search form.
    29. Placing links in teeny-tiny size font at the bottom of your homepage is an effective tactic to raise the rankings of deep pages in your site.
    30. Using a service that promises to register your site with “hundreds of search engines” is good for your site’s rankings.
    31. Home page PageRank on a domain means something.
    32. Outsourcing link building to a far-away, hourly contractor with no knowledge of your business is a good link acquisition solution.
    33. The clickthrough rate on the SERPs matters.
    34. Keyword density is da bomb..
    35. Hyphenated domain names are best for SEO.
    36. Great Content = Great Rankings.

    To read the full article (with explanations of why he believes they’re all myths) head over to http://searchengineland.com/36-seo-myths-that-wont-die-but-need-to-40076.

    SEO news blog post by @ 4:11 pm

    Categories: SEO Tips
    Tags:

     

    « Newer PostsOlder Posts »
    Level Triple-A conformance icon, W3C-WAI Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 1.0 Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
    Copyright© 2004-2013
    Beanstalk Search Engine Optimization, Inc.
    All rights reserved.