Oops ...
Well, today on Webmaster Radio I presented the finding from the first rel="nofollow" test. A few minutes later in the chat room I was presented with a link to another blog. The post read as follows:
The second round of testing will continue as planned. We're not saying to sp@m anything and certainly not blogs, these tests are run to determine all the available tactics and sometimes just out of curiosity (I don't fish and everybody needs a hobby ;). If we know that posting in forums WITH LEGITIMATE RESPONSES OR COMMENTS will help our site or a client's site in the rankings then it is a useful tactic. I'm hoping not to see a flurry of bots now ransacking blogs and forums with "guaranteed lowest rates on mortgages" or the oh-so-useful Viagra ads.
Blogspam works, but only in large quantitiesAlright, not exactly what I was getting at. In retrospect however, this is a fairly logical conclusion (not the only conclusion but a logical one). That said, there are a myriad of other factors at play which fortunately will trip up many of the would-be spammers hoping to use this tid-bit of info to their advantage.Dave Davies did some research on whether nofollow links still pass some linkjuice, and as it turns out (which we knew of course) it does, a bit… So, for your blogspam to be useful, you have to do it in very very large quantities :)
Posted on http://www.joostdevalk.nl/
The second round of testing will continue as planned. We're not saying to sp@m anything and certainly not blogs, these tests are run to determine all the available tactics and sometimes just out of curiosity (I don't fish and everybody needs a hobby ;). If we know that posting in forums WITH LEGITIMATE RESPONSES OR COMMENTS will help our site or a client's site in the rankings then it is a useful tactic. I'm hoping not to see a flurry of bots now ransacking blogs and forums with "guaranteed lowest rates on mortgages" or the oh-so-useful Viagra ads.
Labels: blog, rel=nofollow, search engine spam






